User talk:Sjoh0050

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~&#126;); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Thanks you for contributing to Wikipedia, particularly for your edits to Congregational church.

Again, welcome! Blarneytherinosaur 02:12, 4 May 2006 (UTC)

The authority of the Bible
Hi Sjoh0050. I've replied to your response at Talk:Presbyterianism. I just wanted to point out that I'm only trying to state the view of the Westminster Standards. I'm not interested in having a go at people who may hold different views to what I believe the Standards say.

The quote you mentioned from the United Reformed Church 'Basis of Union' has a lot in common with the Question 3 of the Larger Catechism: "

Q. 3. What is the Word of God?

A. The holy Scriptures of the Old and New Testament are the Word of God, the only rule of faith and obedience."

The two quotes agree on this point: the Bible should always be the supreme authority.

(The ‘Basis of Union’ quote mentions “the help of the Spirit”. Some people might use this to say, "The Holy Spirit told me not to believe (or obey) this or that part of the Bible.” However, God does not change His mind, so the Holy Spirit cannot contradict the written Word of God. “I the LORD do not change” Malachi 3:6, “Every good gift and every perfect gift is from above, coming down from the Father of lights with whom there is no variation or shadow due to change” James 1:17 (ESV).)

This is what I believe that the Westminster Standards teach, in line with the Word of God. I trust that this will not cause offence to you, but that we will both be able to continue contributing happily to Wikipedia. Blarneytherinosaur 01:40, 20 May 2006 (UTC)

Great to see Wikipedians who can discuss different views without losing their tempers. Blarneytherinosaur 02:42, 2 June 2006 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Sjoh0050! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created  is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the article:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 06:32, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Roy Kettle -

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Architects who worked in Oxford
Category:Architects who worked in Oxford, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Occuli (talk) 18:07, 13 May 2011 (UTC)

Greetings
Hello! – Kaihsu (talk) 20:09, 29 June 2011 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:41, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Hedley Mitchells


A tag has been placed on Hedley Mitchells requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. -- Rrburke (talk) 16:22, 1 November 2016 (UTC)

WP:Category
I've redirected the category you created, Category:Teacher training colleges, to the existing Category:Education schools. Please be careful not to create categories that duplicate existing categories. Thanks. — swpb T 16:35, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

A page you started (St Columba's United Reformed Church, Oxford) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating St Columba's United Reformed Church, Oxford, Sjoh0050!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"Thanks for your time and effort in writing this - it's appreciated. It's been reviewed now. Could you look at it and see if you can help address the improvement tags? Thanks again for your hard work."

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Boleyn (talk) 19:03, 21 February 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation
Hi Sjoh0050, thanks for the work you've been doing. I note that you sometimes change the names of some articles by adding a comma disambiguation. In general we don't add any form of disambiguation to an article title if it is not needed. We use a WP:PRECISE article name. We only disambiguate when there are two or more articles with the same title. If the article title is unique, then disambiguation is not needed. This also applies when creating new articles. Use the most precise title you can - this helps people find the article, and also helps editors in linking to the article, as the disambiguation word often needs to be hidden behind a piped link. Any questions, please contact me on my talk page. Regards  SilkTork  ✔Tea time  10:39, 23 March 2017 (UTC)


 * Hi, thanks for the comment. You have added confusion by moving the St. Columba's URC, Oxford page to St. Columba's URC - to my knowledge, there are St. Columba's URCs in Cambridge, Gosport, Coventry, North Shields and possibly elsewhere.  They may not have articles at the moment, but your move sets up the possibility for confusion.  I hope you will agree that your change should be reverted.  Sjoh0050 (talk) 10:43, 23 March 2017 (UTC)


 * On the whole we don't pre-disambiguate (the only time this happens is with ships). When new articles are created which share the same name, that is when we look at the question of disambiguating, and we make the assessment of the best approach at that time. Sometimes a title may be the primary topic, and so is not disambiguated, but has a hatnote added linking to the other articles; or we may decide to create a disambiguation page. We cannot go around second guessing what may happen, so our policy is to create articles with a precise name, and to deal with issues which may arise later, assuming they do, which they may not! I hope that makes sense?  SilkTork  ✔Tea time  10:54, 23 March 2017 (UTC)


 * Not really. The name the church uses is St. Columba's URC, Oxford - the article simply reflects that - it isn't adding an additional layer (like saying 'in central Oxford', for example).  This feels like unhelpful dogma rather than practical editing.  Sjoh0050 (talk) 10:56, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

English Covenant
Ping! English Covenant – Kaihsu (talk) 17:51, 11 June 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 7
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nigel Crisp, Baron Crisp, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hugh Taylor. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:20, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Alliance for Democracy and Freedom


The article Alliance for Democracy and Freedom has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "No indication that this is a notable political party."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ... disco spinster   talk  17:54, 18 November 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Alliance for Democracy and Freedom for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alliance for Democracy and Freedom is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Alliance for Democracy and Freedom until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ... disco spinster   talk  21:10, 18 November 2020 (UTC)

North Wales Baptist College moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, North Wales Baptist College, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 13:52, 28 November 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Cristo Foufas


The article Cristo Foufas has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp/dated tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Fram (talk) 15:49, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:North Wales Baptist College
Hello, Sjoh0050. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:North Wales Baptist College, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:04, 30 April 2021 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, Sjoh0050

Thank you for creating John-Paul Marks.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with. Please remember to sign your reply with ~.

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 22:51, 12 June 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Marjorie Glasgow


A tag has been placed on Marjorie Glasgow requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.ditchley.com/mrs-marjorie-neasham-glasgow-bem. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.  Onel 5969  TT me 10:41, 9 September 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 29 November 2022 (UTC)