User talk:Skaglick

Recent edit to Princess Bubblegum
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Princess Bubblegum, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 10:14, 14 October 2018 (UTC)

October 2018
Fundamentally, you need to explain why that vandal was using the same browser on the same computer as you. --Yamla (talk) 13:25, 17 October 2018 (UTC)


 * The chances "may be extremely small", but the technical evidence indicates that it happened. Also "he did it, not me" isn't an argument that is considered very convincing. I'm going to be honest, I'm sorry but based on what you're saying here I don't see grounds for an unblock. - The Bushranger One ping only 04:43, 18 October 2018 (UTC)

i know that it happened, i was never denying that, i have mentioned it to him, but that is beside the point. The Bushranger How am i meant to get evidence to prove that i am innocent, i have no idea and i imagine no way to prove it myself, if i can refer to anything it is my edit history, though my edits are poor in grammer, and though my edits dont site sources correctly it was all in good intention, like my Princess Bubblegum Edit, it was one of my first edits and i was told to cite i source, i learnt from that, i went back there and i sourced a site to provide information that i found important for people to know... if there is a way that i can obtain proof to show i am not a sock puppet, than i am more than willing to listen
 * I am leaning towards offering the benefit of the doubt, however first I would like to hear an explanation of your relationship with User:Leo13805. Yunshui 雲 水 07:27, 18 October 2018 (UTC)

Leo13805 was an accidental account, when i was making this account it said there was a problem with the name Skaglick or something, so i went ahead and made an account by the name of leo13805 and it sent me to the home page of wiki, it was signed into Skaglick, so realising it worked i checked my emails i had an email confirmation for my account Skaglick, right above this was an email labelled "account creation for wikipedia" and it said the account leo13805 was created with a temporary password, it says this password will be gone in 7 days so i have just left it untouched. That account was just a mistake
 * Ok. If you'd denied any connection I'd have left this account blocked, but since you've been honest about this I'm even more inclined to believe you. Based on a re-review of the CU data, your explanation is plausible - assuming the school uses the same make and model of computers, with the same software, on the same network (which is reasonably likely) the useragent data could be giving a false positive, plus there are editing patterns and timings which could be interpreted to indicate that you and Tomforward are different individuals. I'm therefore giving you the benefit of the doubt and unblocking this account. Yunshui 雲 水 08:18, 18 October 2018 (UTC)

Thank you, is it alright if i delete all of this now? Or is it best to keep all of this -Skaglick-Skaglick (talk) 08:24, 18 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Since the block is no longer active, yes, you can remove all of the above content if you wish. Yunshui 雲 水 09:03, 18 October 2018 (UTC)