User talk:Skakkle/2

talk archv :: 1|User talk:Skakkle/1

Speedy deletion nomination of Rosalind Maud Cubitt


A tag has been placed on Rosalind Maud Cubitt requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Fæ (talk) 14:00, 20 November 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Rosalind Maud Cubitt


The article Rosalind Maud Cubitt has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * no indication of notability - notability does not transfer to parents. Should redirect to daughter or husband, who are both notable.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PamD (talk) 14:59, 20 November 2010 (UTC)

Stacks
I was about to delete your subpage on Ms Herrera aka Stacks as an "attack page" (which it very much looked like), then thought perhaps I should check Google to see if just possibly you weren't making it up. To my surprise, you're not.

That said, however, you really can't say that sort of thing about someone on Wikipedia, even if it's just a proto-article in your userspace, without providing sources for those statements. If it wasn't for the fact that you were active as recently as yesterday, I'd have taken the page down anyway.

So, here's the deal. Today is Monday. You have until Friday to supply reliable sources for the statements which are negative in tone, or to remove those statements from the page. If you haven't at least made an effort by Friday or so, the whole page is coming down. DS (talk) 14:46, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
 * I've deleted the page as a negative unsourced BLP (per G10). Rather than wait for references, it would be best for you to find references and recreate the article. If you find reliable sources, I'll be happy to recreate the article. However, until they're found, it's speedyable as a negative unsourced BLP page. – GorillaWarfare talk • contribs 00:06, 22 February 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. When you recently edited Hypothecation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Repo (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:56, 17 January 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 13
Hi. When you recently edited Leo Burnett Worldwide, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Hughes (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:57, 13 March 2012 (UTC)

Template:Tooshort 2 listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Template:Tooshort 2. Since you had some involvement with the Template:Tooshort 2 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Magioladitis (talk) 11:35, 8 April 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 21
Hi. When you recently edited Bob Brown (The Unit), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Spanish (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:05, 21 April 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Translation convention


The article Translation convention has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Can't find any references except TV Tropes. I don't thinks this meets the notability test.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. KarlB (talk) 03:26, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Are you going to provide any references or shall I send it to AfD straight away? &mdash; RHaworth (talk · contribs) 08:58, 11 May 2012 (UTC)
 * I should be interested to know why you deleted the above comment. &mdash; RHaworth (talk · contribs) 20:15, 13 May 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Translation convention for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Translation convention is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Translation convention until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. &mdash; RHaworth (talk · contribs) 20:13, 13 May 2012 (UTC)

Invitation to wikiFeed
Hello Skakkle,

I'm part of a team that is researching ways to help Wikipedia editors find interesting content to contribute to Wikipedia. More specifically, we are investigating whether content from news sources can be used to enhance Wikipedia editing. We have created a tool, called wikiFeed, that allows you to specify Twitter and/or RSS feeds from news sources that are interesting to you. wikiFeed then helps you make connections between those feeds and Wikipedia articles. We believe that using this tool may be a lot of fun, and may help you come up with some ideas on how to contribute to Wikipedia in ways that interest you. Please participate! To do so, complete this survey and follow this link to our website. Once you're there, click the "create an account" link to get started.

For more information about wikiFeed, visit our project page. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask via my talk page, or by email at wikifeedcc@gmail.com. We appreciate your time and hope you enjoy playing with wikiFeed!

Thanks! WorldsApart (talk) 20:04, 24 July 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 19
Hi. When you recently edited Legal fiction, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Multinational (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 04:43, 19 August 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 26
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Two-party system, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Third party (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:34, 26 August 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 28
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Non-zero, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Robert Wright (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 01:35, 28 October 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Style Of Eye


A tag has been placed on Style Of Eye requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. — Ṟ  Ṉ™  20:18, 30 October 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 6
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Globally unique identifier, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Real-world (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:30, 6 November 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 13
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Program Executive Office Command Control Communications Tactical, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page C4ISR (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:19, 13 November 2012 (UTC)

Your signature
Just in case you didn’t know, the “E” and “L“ in your Wikipedia signature are redlinks, and I can’t figure out what those two article names (“ying yang” and “oingo boingo” respectively) have to do with identifying who you are. Also, I notice there’s no link to this Talk page, which is always a good thing to have. If all of this was intentional, I apologize, but if it wasn’t, I hope I helped by pointing it out. Take care. —Frungi (talk) 23:50, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
 * you're very kind. I forgot how far past civilized the place is regarding behaviors de trolo lo. :lolo. I'll say this- I was always a non conformist way before internets communities.


 * long live Navid Negahban

backlinks are badhollaq

skakEL 03:10, 7 January 2013 (UTC)

June 2013
Please do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you. I am One of Many (talk) 00:51, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
 * like what? skakEL 17:16, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
 * I think I must have clicked on the wrong link, because I only warned IPs that day. Please accept my deepest apologies for this mistake and I'll strike it. --I am One of Many (talk) 17:26, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
 * I had to retract my apology. You created an attack page, which was deleted and so it no longer exists. When an attack page is tagged for speedy deletion, a warning is automatically generated.--I am One of Many (talk) 18:15, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
 * what is the point of such a warning? I don't remember what I created. is there not a log of these deletions?

Your deleted sandbox
You asked at REFUND about your deleted sandbox. I agree with Alison that it was not a G10 page attacking a specific person, but as it started "fuck you nigger. person x reserves the right or ability to rape and or oppress and or subjugate... " it would certainly come under WP:UPNOT: "'you may not include in your user space material that is likely to bring the project into disrepute, or which is likely to give widespread offense... Extremely offensive material may be removed on sight by any editor.'" I suggest you have a look at WP:User pages - users have a lot of freedom in their user pages, but there are limits, they still belong to Wikipedia, not to you, they are visible to everyone, and they are primarily there to be used to help build the encyclopedia. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 20:54, 8 June 2013 (UTC)


 * thanks. you have restored my faith that wikipedia is a generally fair, equitable place. It seems that freedom to be somewhat heinous outside the mainspace is not entirely curtailed. and I love your impersonation of the trolly me that wrote that.


 * respectfully, person x has never been defined in any discourse, nor a relevant page ever created at that location. so, provocative as it may be, it is difficult to say who in that silly statement is reserving a right or ability to behave like an African village strongman.

_
 * someone might want to refine/ clarify User pages a bit. while db-attack is listed as an exception, the status quo seems to favor the discretion on deleters, not the possible creative expression, albeit provocative, of an idea by the userspace "owner".


 * also, from Attack_page, "'Attack pages may also be blanked as courtesy.'"


 * anyway, thanks for ruling our G10. skakEL 21:48, 8 June 2013 (UTC)


 * I would add that your subsequent creation of pages such as User:Skakkle/sandbox/turkey bacon, User:Skakkle/y u do dis, User:Skarolex/sandbox and User:Skakkle/sandbox/fat are verging on disruption for the sake of making a point. Userpages are not yours to do with as you will; per the userpage policy, these pages are "for organizing and aiding the work users do on Wikipedia, and facilitating interaction and sharing between users". Wikipedia is not a webhost; if you want to engage others in arguments about freedom of speech or rant about censorship you are welcome to do so on your own website or blog. On the other hand, if you want to constructively engage other Wikipedia editors on the merits or otherwise of the current speedy deletion policy, the place to do so is at WT:CSD, not by creating inappropriate pages. The appropriate course of action on your part would be to apply a tag to the sandbox pages listed above. Yunshui  雲 &zwj; 水  10:14, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

June 2013
Please do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you. Rob Sinden (talk) 09:13, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
 * I forget what I did that got this reaction. skakEL 15:35, 4 September 2013 (UTC)