User talk:Skakkle/old userpage

Concern regarding Draft:International Legal Forum (Israel)
Hello, Skakkle. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:International Legal Forum (Israel), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:02, 17 November 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:International Legal Forum (Israel)


Hello, Skakkle. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "International Legal Forum".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 21:51, 17 December 2021 (UTC)

"Non-US" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Non-US and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 11 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. signed,Rosguill talk 20:03, 11 January 2022 (UTC)

"Liberty activism" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Liberty activism and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 19 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. signed,Rosguill talk 18:50, 19 January 2022 (UTC)

"Foreign adversary" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Foreign adversary and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 20 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. signed,Rosguill talk 17:59, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

US-centric redirects
Hey, you've probably noticed my reviews of several of your recent redirects. I've noticed that you have had a recent pattern of creating redirects from generic phrases to US-specific articles (in addition to the ones sent to RfD per the above notices, there was Constitutional concept, and perhaps most egregiously: Anti-monarchical pointing to the American Revolution). Please be a bit more mindful when creating new redirects, and check if there are any other potential targets or meanings for the redirects before you create them. signed,Rosguill talk 18:04, 20 January 2022 (UTC)"when I create a redirect that points to a US-related target it is because I view the topic as primarily related to the US. If others feel that they are actually more international topics, then I imagine they should expand or point them to an appropriate target. I don't view them as 'generic phrases', I view them as concepts which ought to be explained, but the content that would explain them doesn't yet have a proper home on wikip (usually a section, sometimes its own article). But it seems like the preferred path is to delete. Do your thing. My intention is to follow the WP:Be bold maxim. But if they get deleted, no big deal. It's a big encyclopedia. There's plenty of space for everyone to do their thing & we can all do our best to not step on each other's toes as we go along. I wish you good fortune. skakEL 05:11, 22 January 2022 (UTC)"