User talk:Skashifakram/Archive27 27

Your contributed article, Terrorism in france


Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, Terrorism in france. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - No content so duplicates [[:Category:Terrorism in France]]. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at No content so duplicates [[:Category:Terrorism in France]] - you might like to discuss new information at Talk:No content so duplicates [[:Category:Terrorism in France|the article's talk page]].

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. QU TalkQu 18:56, 25 March 2012 (UTC)

Thank youSkashifakram (talk) 03:04, 26 March 2012 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via live help, or on the [ reviewer's talk page]
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia!  Nolelover   Talk · Contribs  18:01, 6 April 2012 (UTC)

GA nomination ofList of Muslim Nobel Laureates
I have removed the GA nomination as List class articles are not eligible for GA status. See Good article criteria You may wish to nominate at WP:FLC Jezhotwells (talk) 12:21, 8 April 2012 (UTC)

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Orhan Pamuk.jpeg
Thanks for uploading File:Orhan Pamuk.jpeg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file.

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is [ a list of your uploads]. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 08:23, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

License tagging for File:Abdus Salam color.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Abdus Salam color.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 09:05, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Shirin Ebadi.jpeg
Thanks for uploading File:Shirin Ebadi.jpeg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the media description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fut.Perf. ☼ 09:29, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

April 2012
Please do not continue to upload files with missing or false information on their copyright status. Please note that Wikipedia takes copyright and copyright infringement very seriously. Images and other media may only be uploaded and included if they meet the conditions stated in our image use policy, and if their provenance is clearly documented. If you have questions, feel free to ask at the copyright question page or on my talk page. Thank you. Fut.Perf. ☼ 09:39, 11 April 2012 (UTC) What!what is false information and tell me why are you deleting files without notification!--Skashifakram (talk) 09:42, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Abdus salam free.jpeg


A tag has been placed on File:Abdus salam free.jpeg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 12:45, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

License tagging for File:Banker to the poor4.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Banker to the poor4.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 14:05, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

License tagging for File:Abdus Salam 2.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Abdus Salam 2.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 14:06, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Orhan Pamuk.jpeg
Thanks for uploading File:Orhan Pamuk.jpeg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the media description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:22, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:Banker to the poor4.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Banker to the poor4.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:23, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Banker to the poor4.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Banker to the poor4.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 16:28, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 15
Hi. When you recently edited List of awards and nominations received by Shahrukh Khan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page SRK (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:20, 15 April 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 23
Hi. When you recently edited Chubb fellowship, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page George Bush (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:28, 23 April 2012 (UTC)

edit war notice
Your recent editing history at Carly Fiorina shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Toddst1 (talk) 13:36, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
 * re note that removal of poorly sourced contentious information about a living person is not subject to 3RR restrictions. --  The Red Pen of Doom  19:08, 23 April 2012 (UTC)

Chubb fellowship
Redlinked categories are not allowed on articles. If you want the uncat tag off Chubb fellowship, then you need to find categories that actually exist — otherwise, you need to leave the tag alone until someone else finds the right categories for you. But you cannot add a category that does not exist and call the page properly categorized. Bearcat (talk) 03:07, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

atheist
You appear to be holding to a particular rigid definition of atheist, I suggest you look at the article atheism, particularly this section Atheist. IRWolfie- (talk) 11:24, 9 June 2012 (UTC)

Your contributed article, List of Indian Muslims


Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, List of Indian Muslims. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - Category:Indian Muslims. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Category:Indian Muslims - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Zujua (talk) 09:06, 30 July 2012 (UTC)

Neutral notice of an RfC
A Request for Comment has been posted for an article on which you have been an editor. If you wish to comment, go to Talk:List of African-American firsts. --Tenebrae (talk) 11:37, 9 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Hi, Skash. Not sure I understand the tag &mdash; most of the entries are bluelinked, and there are 65 footnotes additionally. --Tenebrae (talk) 12:12, 9 August 2012 (UTC)

Muslim Nobel Laureates
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war on the article List of Muslim Nobel Laureates Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

This person has already violated the rule and is liable to have his account banned from Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 182.68.117.25 (talk) 11:42, 27 July 2013 (UTC)

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 182.68.153.28 (talk) 00:15, 27 July 2013 (UTC)

I do not have to ask Jokers and Fools to know what is vandalism. First of all the edits remove non-constructive comments from the Article which are not constructive. What is the comment from Dr. Abdus Salaam on Quran doing in the article. It has nothing to do with his work. If you do not understand the meaning of Neutral Point of View and Encyclopedic entry then you should simply get lost from Wikipedia.

Besides you are not allowed to remove this template and have already been reported to the Admins.

You're insulting me, at least, sign your comment!--Skashifakram (talk) 13:16, 27 July 2013 (UTC)

It will be auto signed by a bot. Do not worry. Also calling a persons work foolish and non constructive is not an insult. Also you have made a grave mistake putting that template on my page. To be honest you have reverted the edit first and more than 3 times. Prepare to be blocked soon enough. What you put there is irrelevant.

Why are you threatening me! Be courageous! sign your comment!--Skashifakram (talk) 13:23, 27 July 2013 (UTC)

I am not threatening you. I am just showing you your space and your duties. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 182.68.117.25 (talk) 13:26, 27 July 2013 (UTC)

You've already been reported to admins, please dare to sign your comment! Thanks!--Skashifakram (talk) 13:30, 27 July 2013 (UTC)

Do not worry. I am happy to be reported. You are the one who is scared and is removing the template. Also you foolishly put the template on my talk page. Why don't you let the admins decide your fate and mine. Lets see who is getting blocked and whose edits are staying there. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 182.68.117.25 (talk) 13:33, 27 July 2013 (UTC)

Please be Civil, thanks!--Skashifakram (talk) 13:41, 27 July 2013 (UTC)

Come on! Shock me! Say something smart 182.68.117.25 (talk) 13:43, 27 July 2013 (UTC)

http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/robcrilly/100173926/why-abdus-salam-pakistans-great-physicist-has-been-written-out-of-history-by-his-own-country/ -- — Preceding unsigned comment added by 182.68.117.25 (talk) 13:49, 27 July 2013 (UTC)

Please control yourself, be civil and sign your comment! I am not an advocate of Muslims or Pakistan! Hope you got it! Thanks!Skashifakram (talk) 13:55, 27 July 2013 (UTC)

Still does not explain why you feel the edits were not desired. What is a statement by Abdus Salaam doing in the Article. Why do you think removing an unnecessary quote from encyclopedic entry is wrong. If you have so much affection for that particular quote then use wikiquote. What is not desired is not desired. Be Civil (LOL). You are the one vandalizing the article and now you are telling me to be civil. 182.68.117.25 (talk) 14:02, 27 July 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for Signing!Skashifakram (talk) 14:10, 27 July 2013 (UTC)

Would be happy if you learn to use the Article Talk Page instead of violating 3 Revert Rule. Non constructive edits are not desirable and are considered vandalism. 182.68.117.25 (talk) 14:13, 27 July 2013 (UTC)

Do it thyself! Thanks again for signing and being a little civil!--Skashifakram (talk) 14:39, 27 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Both of you are edit warring and there is no vandalism going on in the article. Both of you use the talk page of the article to discuss improvements, and don't take those discussions to users talk pages. IP stop warring, Skashifakram stop edit warring and please read WP:OWN as you seem to have some ownership issues with the article in question. Canterbury Tail   talk  15:21, 27 July 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for your constructive suggestions!--Skashifakram (talk) 15:46, 27 July 2013 (UTC)

Your article submission List of Nontheist Nobel laureates


Hello Skashifakram. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled List of Nontheist Nobel laureates.

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the  or  code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code:, paste it in the edit box at this link , click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Rankersbo (talk) 08:04, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of List of Muslim sportspersons


The article List of Muslim sportspersons has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Article that fails WP:GNG, WP:INDISCRIMINATE.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Inter&#38;anthro (talk) 01:51, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of List of Muslim Nobel laureates


A tag has been placed on List of Muslim Nobel laureates, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate,. Under the specified criteria, where a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. jps (talk) 19:05, 11 October 2015 (UTC)