User talk:Skateremorocker

Stefan Bartlett
A tag has been placed on Stefan Bartlett, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing no content to the reader. Please note that external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article don't count as content. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template   to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Dacheatcode (talk) 21:11, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

Are you a self hating Christian?
What is your motive behind removing Christian rock references from all those pages? All of them seem incorrect as the information you delete is backed by cited sources a lot of the time, and is reverted to the prior version. I was gonna report you on the three-revert rule, but I'm giving you a warning, stop this or you are well on your way to being blocked.Hoponpop69 00:23, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

Matt MacDonald
fits the criteria for speedy deletion for the following reason: POV and most likely unneeded --Android Mouse Bot 2 01:13, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

Please Stop
Please do not delete content from articles on Wikipedia. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use Sandbox for test edits.

again
I told you, there is a mediation here. Argue there before you change Anberlin's genres again. Feel free to put yourself in at any time. Pbroks13 19:04, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

He did it again, he is obviously ignoring the rules. When I have time I'll file a request so that he'll be blocked.Hoponpop69 01:51, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you delete or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Hoponpop69 19:31, 15 June 2007 (UTC) (last warning for removing content)

June 2007
This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Anberlin, you will be blocked from editing. Momusufan 20:40, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for 24 hours for persistent edit warring over genres. Academic Challenger 20:45, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. Pbroks13 18:30, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

A Couple Things
First off, when you leave someone a comment, please use the talk page, not the user page. Secondly, it doesnt matter how long the mediation has been going; the point is you dont change it until the mediation is over. I'm sorry that you dont want them to be listed as Christian Rock, but until the mediation is over, please do not change the genres. I hope you understand. Pbroks13 15:33, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. An article you recently created, PowerSpace, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new articles, so it will shortly be removed (if it hasn't been already). Please use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do and please read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. Q T C 23:41, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

Signing Posts
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Pbroks13 14:33, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

Notability of The Goodnight Fight
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on The Goodnight Fight, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because The Goodnight Fight seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting The Goodnight Fight, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 16:42, 22 July 2007 (UTC)

Anberlin
Skateremorocker, please check Requests for mediation/Anberlin and Wikipedia talk:Requests for mediation/Anberlin. This whole issue has been gone over recently, and the agreed-upon consensus is that "Christian rock" will be listed as one of Anberlin's genre's, along with a note linking down to the Christian rock section of the page. I'm not reverting because of a personal vendetta, but because Wikipedia has already decided on this issue, at least for the moment.

In addition, please do not accuse me of defying God by doing this. I'm not arguing against or reverting God; I'm reverting your edits to an article. I'm sorry, but I have no idea what point you're trying to make regarding God's opinion of the article. Are you saying that for some reason, God doesn't want this band to be labelled a Christian rock band? I strongly disagree with you. Anberlin is a band with Christian members, a Christian message to many of their songs, and primarily sells to the Christian market. They've said that they are not a Christian band because they don't want to limit themselves to the Christian market, and in addition they've stated that they don't care if they are labelled a Christian band. I'm not their biggest fan, but I've seen nothing indicating that the band members are dishonoring God in any way. Therefore, Anberlin is truly a "Christian rock band". As a fellow Christian, my actions are dedicated to honoring and reporting the truth -- the whole truth. The current Wikipedia entry does so, to the best of my knowledge. Your edits most definitely do not. Jpers36 18:29, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

Reply
So what if their Myspace states that genre? Perhaps they should read the screamo article, aswell. Myspace isn't a relevant source. The Used lists their genre on their myspace as Crunk and Ghettotech. Does that make them a Crunk or Ghettotech?

Regarding Anberlin
It was decided by a collaboration of editors that Anberlin should be listed as Alternative Rock and Christian Rock. You can view the entire discussion by going to Requests for mediation/Anberlin and Wikipedia talk:Requests for mediation/Anberlin. Please realize that I am not reverting your edits because of some personal vendetta that I have against you or certain musical genres, but because of a concensus that was reached among several Wikipedia editors.

Also, while I own you no explanation for my personal beliefs and decisions, I suppose I'll attempt to do so. First of all, don't judge me (I believe the bible has something to say about that... "If any one of you is without sin, let him be the first to throw a stone at her." John 8:7 NIV). I am well aware that many people and doctrines do not approve of or support homosexuality, which is part of the reason that I claim no denominational affiliation. Also, God does love everyone. What he doesn't love is sin. The bible says that homosexual prostitution, homosexual promiscuity, and homosexual rape are sins, and the same goes for heterosexuals doing the same thing. The bible does not say that simply finding someone of the same sex attractive justifies a one-way ticket to hell. It's no different than a heterosexual man looking at a woman and thinking that she's pretty. I am not living a promiscuous sex life, and at the moment I intend to remain celibate for the rest of my days. I'm not asking you to agree with me, but please do not badger and berate me. Wikipedia is not the place for this. —Mears man 13:44, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

The Classic Crime
Please stop removing sourced genres like you did here. This seems to be apattern in your editing. Hoponpop69 23:54, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

Please do not threaten me, or remove sources like you did here. You are not an admin so you can not ban me. If you wanted to you could file a report requesting I be banned, but I'm pretty sure the admin's would side in my favor. Hoponpop69 22:21, 24 September 2007 (UTC)

Please see that pages talk page. Hoponpop69 02:28, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

Bands like AC/DC never play at christian rock festivals for the simple fact that they are NOT Christian rock bands. Please agree here to have this feud moderated by an admin. Hoponpop69 23:38, 30 September 2007 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case
You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Suspected sock puppets/Skateremorocker for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Hoponpop69 19:03, 30 September 2007 (UTC)

Request for mediation
A request for mediation has been filed with the Mediation Committee that lists you as a party. The Mediation Committee requires that all parties listed in a mediation must be notified of the mediation. Please review the request at Requests for mediation/The Classic Crime, and indicate whether you agree or disagree to mediation. If you are unfamiliar with mediation on Wikipedia, please refer to Mediation. Please note there is a seven-day time limit on all parties responding to the request with their agreement or disagreement to mediation. Thanks,  Daniel  04:55, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

Request for Mediation
This message delivered by MediationBot, an automated bot account operated by the Mediation Committee to perform case management. If you have questions about this bot, please contact the Mediation Committee directly.

Since the request was denied, please make a note at Mediation Cabal/Cases/2007-10-03 The Classic Crime saying you agree to this new mediation. Hoponpop69 20:05, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

You are signing your posts incorrectly
When your editing a page click the link below the edit summary that says "Sign your username:" in order to sign your posts.Hoponpop69 21:57, 4 October 2007 (UTC)

I have reason to believe you lied about having an article mediated in order to avoid changes being made to it
That wouldn't be very Christian of you. Go here to see my evidence. Hoponpop69 23:29, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
 * We've got a related MedCab case open. I'd like you to chime in. --Haemo 00:41, 7 October 2007 (UTC)

The Classic Crime
Please stop edit warring over such a pointless issue. The only genres that are acceptable are those that you can provide reliable sources for. For your information, this source is not reliable. It is quite clear that the last sentence or two are added as an after thought, and I am inclined to believe it was added by you. It is poorly witten, and itself does not provide and references. You need the primary source (i.e. the original interview) in which the band stated they are not Christian rock. In any case, it doesn't matter what the band say they are, it only counts as to what the music is.Nouse4aname 16:26, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

Underoath
I have reverted your edit on Underoath because the category "Screamo musical groups" doesn't even exist on Wikipedia. Also note that edit-warring over what genre Underoath belongs in has been named one of the lamest edit wars ever. --Jaysweet 20:43, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

October 2007
Before adding a category to an article, please make sure that the subject of the article really belongs in the category that you specified. If it has not been already, it may be removed if the category has not been deemed correct for the subject matter. I am not going to get involved in an argument over categories, but please link to a category that freaking exists, okay? Jaysweet 21:12, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

Blocked
You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia for a period of 24 hours because evidence at Suspected sock puppets/skateremorocker shows that you have used multiple accounts disruptively. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text below. --Akhilleus (talk) 16:29, 20 October 2007 (UTC)

Would you consider the user adoption program?
Hey there Skateremorocker! I saw your edits at Underoath and noticed you were having a little bit of trouble... I think you are right that they are a Screamo group, but there isn't a "Screamo groups" category, so when you linked to that category it broke the page. Your intention was good, but I had to revert the edit because it wasn't done properly.

Since you seem to be serious about editing Wikipedia, I thought you might want to consider the user adoption program to help you learn how to get around these little technical hurdles and be a positive contributor. All you have to do is put on your User page, and someone will come along and provide advice and mentoring for you.

If you are interested but aren't sure how, let me know and I can add the tag for you. Best of luck!! --Jaysweet 20:25, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

Adoption Request


has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing! Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message. Hello:) I saw your adoption request and I would be more than happy to adopt you. I have been editing wikipedia for a year, and have over 15000 edits. I will be able to help you with vandal fighting, policies and guidlines, and to some degree article writing. If interested contact me on my talk page. Thanks:) --SJP:Happy Verterans Day! 18:11, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
 * If you ever need help feel free to ask me. Cheers!--SJP:Happy Verterans Day! 02:07, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Ivoryline
A tag has been placed on Ivoryline requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.  Sting_au   Talk  02:52, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case
You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Suspected sock puppets/Skateremorocker(2nd) for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Hoponpop69 (talk) 05:18, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

Concerning your removal of sourced content in Mae
This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you delete or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Hoponpop69 (talk) 01:59, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Revisiting Anberlin's genre
Hi, I noticed you were involved in the previous discussion about Anberlin's genre (specifically the Christian rock genre), and I just wanted to let you know that the matter has resurfaced again. I just wanted to invite you to take a look at the article's talk page and leave a comment sharing your ideas, views, suggestions, etc. Thanks! —Mears man (talk) 03:14, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

Signing comments
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. --Pbroks13 00:55, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

Notability of Since October
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Since October, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Since October seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Since October, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that '''this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here''' CSDWarnBot (talk) 19:38, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

August Burns Red statistics
You recently changed the number of copies sold of August Burns Red's Messengers to 65,000. Could you possibly show me where you found that info? It's currently uncited and I'd like to get rid of that "citation needed" tag. Thanks! -- FatalError 17:19, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

Notability of Since October
A tag has been placed on Since October requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Duffbeerforme (talk) 11:11, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Since October
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Since October, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Duffbeerforme (talk) 06:20, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

Genre Changes
Please, please, please. Please STOP changing genres on the pages of every band you like. This is not, not, not constructive. I repeat, this is not constructive. Chubbles (talk) 20:19, 16 June 2008 (UTC)

The Almost
Hi, I saw where you had been involved in the genre dispute on this article. A user is trying to add 'Christian rock' and citing it with unreliable sources that only say they are Christians. Please weigh in with your thoughts if you don't mind. I just told her that if she wants the genre in the infobox to find a reliable source that confirms it. You may want it there, who knows, anyways still weigh in on the matter if you don't mind. Landon1980 (talk) 15:48, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

Christian music debate
Hey, hope you're doing well. I invite you to participate in a Christian music debate that I've started. I did it to keep the whole thing in one place, because it's starting to span across several band articles. Thanks. — Fatal Error 21:36, 19 August 2008 (UTC)

Lost in The Sound of Seperation and Genres
Do you know what post hardcore is? It is a genre that "evolved" from hardcore, that is an "offshoot of the broader punk movement." The genre is typified by "a balance of dissonance and melody, in part channeling the loud and fast hardcore ethos into more measured, subtle forms of tension and release." Now, given Underoath's current sound (i.e. a balance of metalcore screaming, with Gillespsie's vocals, and Dudley's synthetic overlays), their past (punk and hardcore punk) influences, and the scene that they developed their music in (i.e. they arose in a predominantly punk, hardcore punk, and post-hardcore punk music scene), how exactly do you reason that Underoath and, more specifically, this album is not post-hardcore? Ł ittle Ä lien¹8² (talk\contribs) 04:00, 28 August 2008 (UTC)

And please start discussing genre edits on the talk page of articles. They are highly debated topics and, as such, require the consensus of the editors of the article. Changing them without consensus and/or discussion is not productive and will lead to a reversion of your edit. Thank you for cooperating. Ł ittle Ä lien¹8² (talk\contribs) 04:02, 28 August 2008 (UTC)


 * You are at it again. Please discuss edits made to the genre field.  —  Ł ittle Ä lien¹8² (talk\contribs) 01:05, 8 November 2008 (UTC)

Underoath
Why did you remove post hardcore from the lead paragraph of the Underoath article? It has been referenced and discussed, and is located in the infobox. Please discuss changes of this nature (i.e. adding or removing genres) on the article's talk page. Thanks. Ł ittle Ä lien¹8² (talk\contribs) 23:26, 9 September 2008 (UTC)

Ivoryline
Don't remove fact tags without fixing the problem. You've been around way, way long enough to know this. Chubbles (talk) 02:02, 25 October 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Lower Definition
A tag has been placed on Lower Definition, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. TheLetterM (talk) 02:54, 20 November 2008 (UTC)

Once again on removing sources...
Stop doing it! If you do it again I am reporting you!Hoponpop69 (talk) 01:21, 25 October 2009 (UTC)

You ignored this warning again with this edit. I will file a report on you later.Hoponpop69 (talk) 17:37, 14 November 2009 (UTC)

ANI notice
Hello,. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. GiantSnowman 18:34, 14 November 2009 (UTC)

April 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. I have noticed that some of your recent genre changes, such as the one you made to The Classic Crime, have conflicted with our neutral point of view and verifiability policies. While we invite all users to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, we urge all editors to provide reliable sources for edits made. When others disagree, we recommend you to seek consensus for certain edits. Thank you. -- Kraftlos  (Talk | Contrib) 11:41, 22 April 2010 (UTC)

What is your issue?
Do you just have nothing better to do? The only thing you seem to have done since September '09 is genre war for The Classic Crime and Switchfoot. Just because you don't think they're Christian doesn't make it true.

If you're not gonna make useful edits then f*** off, cause no one here wants to deal with your undoing your bulls***.

--Spence The Chef (talk) 23:40, 8 May 2010 (UTC)

May 2010
Seriously? Adding links to porn videos to talk pages?

Stop being unconstructive with everything you do or you're gonna get reported. --Spence The Chef (talk) 02:09, 14 May 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Sent By Ravens
A tag has been placed on Sent By Ravens requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you.  ttonyb (talk) 04:46, 22 May 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Since October


A tag has been placed on Since October requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. &mdash; RHaworth 15:07, 10 March 2011 (UTC)

super fag — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.76.70.230 (talk) 20:50, 15 July 2011 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:30, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Search the City for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Search the City is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Search the City until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.  danny music editor  oops 20:23, 17 August 2023 (UTC)