User talk:Skauswiki

Ambigram Edit
Welcome to Wikipedia. Just saw your addition to the Ambigram page. Since you are a new user and you have only edited pages, somebody will certainly come along and say that you inserted that information because you have a conflict of interest. Surely, you want to promote Sports Authority and this book (or maybe you're actually Ina Saltz). The fact that the book is relatively unknown by a relatively unknown author doesn't help you. To preempt such an argument, I would start a section on the Talk:Ambigram page about this and explain why you think it's worth including. Is this the only such book on tattoos? The best? The biggest? The only book featuring ambigram tattoos, etc?

As to the mention itself, if the book merely has "several" examples, I don't think it's worth mentioning as there are probably hundreds of books that have several ambigrams in them. If ambigrams feature prominently, that's another story.

RoyLeban (talk) 22:00, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:SportsAuthority.BadgeLogo.Dedicated.jpg


The file File:SportsAuthority.BadgeLogo.Dedicated.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Unused logo, redundant to File:Sports Authority logo2011.jpg"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. B (talk) 14:51, 19 September 2018 (UTC)