User talk:Skdbfkf

September 2022
Hello, I'm Deltaspace42. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Hoploscaphites have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Deltaspace42 (talk) 20:57, 2 September 2022 (UTC)

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Anthony Wood (artist), even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use your sandbox. Thank you. PopoDameron (talk) 20:58, 2 September 2022 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Dunwoodie, Yonkers, you may be blocked from editing. PopoDameron (talk) 20:59, 2 September 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Kearns Peninsula. PopoDameron (talk) 21:00, 2 September 2022 (UTC)

 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. DatGuyTalkContribs 21:00, 2 September 2022 (UTC)

{{{unblock reviewed |1=give me my own way then or back later with more! Remove those opinions please! Skdbfkf (talk) 5:02 pm, Today (UTC−4) |decline = I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
 * the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
 * the block is no longer necessary because you
 * understand what you have been blocked for,
 * will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
 * will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 22:14, 2 September 2022 (UTC)}}

I disagree with those opinions because I know he moved to a new area and had to do that by basically smashing two rocks together due to lack of materials and tools. Considering the way it was made and how it turned out I actually consider it the opposite and it is an excellent example of true skill and mastery to do that with a half blunt rock.

It is very damaging and derogatory and disrespectful to our history and ancestors. Published in a book or not can it please be left in the book. Skdbfkf (talk) 22:50, 2 September 2022 (UTC)

{unblock|reason= then can I request somebody with a more objective unbiased point of view then please  Skdbfkf (talk) 23:06, 2 September 2022 (UTC)}

Sock puppetry
Thanks, now I know you are a WP:SOCK of User talk:Ts4221 -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 22:50, 2 September 2022 (UTC)

Hey! . I found a missing sock!-- Deepfriedokra (talk)
 * Deepfriedokra - Awesome! I see that you put in the block summary that this user is a sock of . What makes you believe that this is indeed the case? And where did you find the missing sock? Was it in the washer or the dryer?  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   01:30, 3 September 2022 (UTC)


 * Demands "removing those two derogatory opinions on Wepwawetemsaf,"  like what Ts4421 did, as a condition for ceasing to vandalize. Well, you don't need to imagine my response, as I stated plainly that I respond poorly to ultimatums. Was wondering what you might see with your magic glasses. Best --  Deepfriedokra (talk) 02:06, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
 * oh, i see you did. Good show. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 02:08, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Deepfriedokra - It was a magnificent show, if you ask me! ;-)  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   02:15, 3 September 2022 (UTC)

September 2022
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for WP:VANDALISM WP:HARASSMENT WP:SOCKPUPPETRY. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 22:52, 2 September 2022 (UTC)

 Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive. ([ block log] • [ active blocks] • [ global blocks] • [//tools.wmflabs.org/xtools/autoblock/?user=&project=en.wikipedia.org autoblocks] • contribs • deleted contribs • [ abuse filter log] • [ creation log] • change block settings • [ unblock] • [ checkuser] ([ log]) )

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

is now closed. User states they intend to sock indefinitely. 331dot (talk) 15:35, 3 September 2022 (UTC)