User talk:Skdeewan

November 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Exposure and response prevention has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. II MusLiM HyBRiD II ZOMG BBQ 12:57, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to Exposure and response prevention constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. II MusLiM HyBRiD II ZOMG BBQ 12:58, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

Welcome!
Hi, and welcome! I disagree with the editor above. Your edits added valuable information! I readded the info on d-cycloserine augmented behavior therapy, a fascinating result indeed, in the ERP article, but formatted in a more typical Wikipedia manner. Hope you will stay here, consider helping out with WikiProject Psychology! Drop me a note on my talk page if you have any questions. /skagedal... 13:46, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

April 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Barley has been reverted, as it appears to have removed content from the page without explanation. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Ixfd64 (talk) 04:35, 12 April 2009 (UTC)

April 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to 2011 military intervention in Libya, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found here. Thank you. HJ Mitchell &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?   00:16, 11 April 2011 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at 2011 military intervention in Libya. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. The reverted edit can be found here. Thank you. HJ Mitchell &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?   00:21, 11 April 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Electrical appliances (domestic) laws for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Electrical appliances (domestic) laws is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Electrical appliances (domestic) laws until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. StraussInTheHouse (talk) 16:26, 17 June 2018 (UTC)