User talk:Skech7

Conflict of interest and copyright
In Talk:Geoffrey Smith (drummer) you have posted a note containing the following text:
 * I have given permission for my biography to be used here.
 * Regards
 * Geoffrey Smith.

Does this mean that you are Geoffrey Smith? If so then by editing the article Geoffrey Smith (drummer) you are in conflict with Wikipedia's conflict of interest guideline. Even if you are not Geoffrey Smith yourself, by giving this quotation from him you imply that you are acting on his behalf, and so are still likely to have a conflict of interest.

Anyway, whether you are Geoffrey Smith or not, your say-so can scarcely be taken as convincing evidence of copyright permission, since anyone could post such a statement into Wikipedia. If Smith has material which he wishes to release to Wikipedia he needs to use a more verifiable method, such as writing to the Wikipedia Foundation.

Finally, material copied from Smith's own blog can scarcely be considered to be neutral or independent, and so is not suitable for a Wikipedia article, no matter who it is who has copied it to Wikipedia. JamesBWatson (talk) 14:06, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

Sean hayz band
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Sean hayz band, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.gbob.com/seanhayzband/bio. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 12:00, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Broadway screamer
A tag has been placed on Broadway screamer requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Kudpung (talk) 13:03, 4 October 2010 (UTC)