User talk:Skepticignorant

Hello Skepticignorant--Checking stuff in the above links can be helpful. So can just diving in and seeing how it goes. Welcome, and have fun. C RETOG 8(t/c) 15:18, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

RE: Hi
Hey, I never edited that page, please make sure you have the right person. --Simonkoldyk 22:42, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

Fact tags confusing
Hello--In Quality of life, I don't really object to the fact tagging (although the article is such a mass of unreferenced-ness, that fact-tagging anything in particular seems either hopeless or leading to an article which is all tags. Oi.), it's just that the way they were placed (by you?) was confusing.

For instance, in the sentence, "However, one can assume with some confidence that the higher average level of diet...", there's already a fact tag, which seems like it should be enough. If it's not, the "one can assume" is less a thing, and more a  thing maybe?

Anyway, that's what I was thinking about. It might help if you matched the tagging with comments on the talk page. C RETOG 8(t/c) 01:17, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

RE: Fact tags confusing
Yeah, that makes sense, thank you. I'm an extreme noob at editing wikipedia. Btw, I only added the ones yesterday, not the others. Maybe the article should be marked as one that doesn't cite many references? I don't know :)