User talk:Skippy McKipperton

Welcome!
Hello, Skippy McKipperton, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or. Again, welcome. Doug Weller talk 13:29, 30 January 2020 (UTC)

I attempted to upload photo evidence and WIKI would not allow it. If you have nothing better to do than treat new users like this then what exactly can be said about the "guidelines"? NOTHING that I posted is incorrect and it is noted that your swift removal of a post without contacting me to assist in making the corrections invalidates this entire source. Corrections and additions should NOT be the sole platform of people that have so much time on their hands that they get involved in things simply for the purpose of policing information to stoke their own ego. Your excessively skewed response to this post and no others is a clear indication that your agenda is to protect liberal mind-speak and a perfectly good example of elitism within the WIKI community. My post is, was ,and will always be accurate. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Skippy McKipperton (talk • contribs) 17:15, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
 * It's unclear who you are addressing this message to, with the above only a Welcome message. However, your above text suggests that you may be on Wikipedia for another purpose than to build it (please see WP:HERE, WP:ADVOCACY and WP:NOT).  The claims in your edit at UFO religion could be correct but like all material in the encyclopedia, especially contentious claims, it must be a fair summary of a reliable source and include a citation for verification (WP:RS, WP:CITE, WP:V), there is no way to verify the claims otherwise.  As for the other edit at Stand Up America it seemed like an implausible conspiracy theory, that too requires a citation from a reliable source, of course.  A user uploaded photo could not be considered as a source.  WP:RSN and WP:RSP can guide to discuss and select them.  I hope this helps, — Paleo  Neonate  – 21:38, 30 January 2020 (UTC)

January 2020
Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:


 * User contributions
 * Recent changes
 * Watchlists
 * Revision differences
 * IRC channels
 * Related changes
 * New pages list
 * Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting. Thanks! Doug Weller talk 13:30, 30 January 2020 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Stand Up America, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. — Paleo Neonate  – 16:41, 30 January 2020 (UTC)

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at User talk:PaleoNeonate. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. But the reply is simple: why would you be immune to the policies of the encyclopedia? It is not designed for WP:FREESPEECH and WP:RS, WP:CITE are policies. If it wasn't me, another editor would have reverted and warned (WP:WARN), a standard process for inappropriate edits. — Paleo Neonate  – 22:25, 31 January 2020 (UTC)

The teahouse
If you believe that we have a personal conflict, other experienced editors are available there to help about editing and understanding Wikipedia processes and policies. — Paleo Neonate  – 22:30, 31 January 2020 (UTC)