User talk:Skiwalkko

Recent edits to Suzi Quatro
Hello, and thank you for your recent contributions. I appreciate the effort you made for our project, but unfortunately I had to undo your edit(s). In particular, something potentially negative or defamatory about a living person needs a reliable source Feel free to contact me directly if you have any questions. Thank you! DemocraticLuntz (talk) 20:30, 19 December 2013 (UTC) What part was negative or defamatory?


 * Information orange.svg Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living persons, as you did to Suzi Quatro. You deleted text with citation; broke another citation; added contentious WP:BLP information without a citation. — Peter Loader (talk) 21:48, 20 December 2013 (UTC)

Okay I made a mistake but it isn;t controversial she didn't have much chart success in the 1980s or 90s its a fact


 * [[Image:Ambox warning pn.svg|25px|alt=|link=]] Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Suzi Quatro. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. I undid unreferenced changes and a broken reference — Peter Loader (talk) 20:46, 21 December 2013 (UTC)

December 2013, continued

 * Nuvola apps important.svg Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Can the Can, you may be blocked from editing. Removal of referenced content. The edit summary's suggestion that Suzi Quatro "isnt a major rock star" is WP:Original Research — Peter Loader (talk) 21:09, 21 December 2013 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either: This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
 * 1) Add four tildes  ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment; or
 * 2) With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (Insert-signature.png or Signature icon.png) located above the edit window.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 21:45, 21 December 2013 (UTC)

Recent edits to Rolling Stone (Suzi Quatro song)
Hello, and thank you for your recent contributions. I appreciate the effort you made for our project, but unfortunately I had to undo your edit(s) because I believe the article was better before you made that change. In particular, you really shouldn't be removing significant information with cited sources an adding uncited information in place. Feel free to contact me directly if you have any questions. Thank you! DemocraticLuntz (talk) 15:24, 22 December 2013 (UTC)

Your use of multiple Wikipedia accounts
Haha what a joke! Wikipedia is perhaps the most shit site I have ever come across.You aren't allowed to edit anything without it going against some insignificant pathetic rule some wanker made up. There's a really hateful, rude, biggoted, bloody minded, bitchy, loathsom old hag called betty logan who is probably overweight and a bitter old lesbian with it, that really enjoys being a bitch. She thinks she knows it all and really doesn't shes as thick as shit really. The bitch from hell removes edits regardless of quality and reverts things that are true or that help an article because she likes to think she's all big editing pages on wikipedia. Well, wikipedia is mocked in schools and colleges for being unreliable but these mini little hitlers think they are all big and powerful editing pages anyone vcan edit. Well you are all pathetic insignificant wankers that desperately need a life! It's all about who agrees with you and whether a stupid rule agrees, as to whether you can make an edit. Even true facts are reveryed by this corrupt poorly run site. I hope no one has to put up with the wankers I've had too. I never want anything to do with this shit, unreliable, corrupt site again and plan to let as many people kknow how shit wikipedia is, as possible. Thanks for bloody nothing, and all those who got in my way. Well you can all go and fuck yourselves!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!