User talk:Skmpark/Feminist language reform

I would describe the article as being in a good place, with room for expansion. It is strong in its lead— it is thorough but not overbearing in that it completely summarizes all that the article will discuss. It offers a helpful definition of what linguistic reform is and how it is a universal topic of conversation, while hinting at what places in the world have made accommodations to reflect said reform. I also find the presence and discussion of sociolinguistics throughout the article to be extremely beneficial, as sociolinguistics are heavily intertwined with the topic. My biggest suggestion would be to simply expand, especially in the language sectors, as these are areas that are underwritten. Discussion of other countries’ implementation of feminist language reform, too, could be useful. Perhaps a tab on Sweden and Australia’s progress on feminist language reform incorporation. Overall, the article is well-developed and could be further perfected by expanding the aforementioned sectors.

Andreaplascencia (talk) 21:09, 6 December 2021 (UTC)