User talk:SkolZiv

Please stop removing Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages as it is considered vandalism. You may comment at the respective page if you oppose an article's deletion. Thanks. RexNL 20:47, 19 April 2006 (UTC)

Copyright
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Ansalon (MUD), but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a direct copy from http://www.ansalonmud.com/. As a copyright violation, Ansalon (MUD) appears to qualify for speedy deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Ansalon (MUD) has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If the source is a credible one, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source. If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GFDL, you can comment to that effect on Talk:Ansalon (MUD). If the article has already been deleted, but you have a proper release, you can reenter the content at Ansalon (MUD), after describing the release on the talk page. However, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. --- O bli (Talk) ? 20:53, 19 April 2006 (UTC)

If you put it that way...
I'll take your word for it, it's restored. It's still being considered for deletion by another user, though, and I'm not really sure about if it's notable enough to warrant an article, you could look over our notability criteria at WP:SOFTWARE and see if the mud meets them. The deletion process takes five days, though, so you'll have plenty of time to prove your case if you think a deletion is unjustified.

You may also want to trim your article to comply with our manual of style, as you may have noticed most wikipedia articles have a certain design.

And thanks for being reasonable, most people who disagree with deletions shout at me :) - O bli (Talk) ? 21:17, 19 April 2006 (UTC)


 * Good luck, and if your article is deleted after all, you could always try making a note about it on Dragonlance or MUD, it does seem relevant if it's as established and old as you say it is. - O bli (Talk) ? 21:30, 19 April 2006 (UTC)