User talk:Skollur

I, Babu Gogineni! No, not me!!
I am not Babu Gogineni. But a user, who plays nonsense with various wikipedia pages vandalized my page by pasting the photograph of Babu Gogineni, the well known humanist and executive director of Internatinal Humanist and Ethical Union. This, I presume, is done with the malicious intention of ruining the reputation of me as a wikipedia contributor and of Babu Gogineni. Though I have contributed nothing in wikipedia which is false or baseless or harmful, it is unethical on the part of anybody to connect my contribution to anybodyelse. And nobody has any business to ruin my user page. If anybody has anything against me, at leaset leave Babu Gogineni alone!Skollur

Hi GRR, now you make your own page for a cover up
Kollur is in Karnataka. You belong to Hyderabad. I heard that your job in London is over and you are back at your native place. You may not have much things to do now. So, it is nice that you immediately write an article about yourself in wikipedia. It fits well, especially when it is exposed that you were using my name and now caught red-handed.

See Babu's own article about himself .

Why this man uses my name while flooding wikipedia pages with a personal agenda?

You are advised to use your own name, not my name. S_kollur

Phew!!
Your General Knowledge is impeccable! Kollur definitely is in Karnataka. But, you again got something completely wrong. I am not Babu Gogineni. Don't spoil his name! And don't waste your precious time, tracking me!! Please do something good to the society!

Now that you have come out in the open, can you please tell me why you uploaded the image of Gogineni? And then created a link in my user page?

Skollur

You are Exposed
Your panic reaction shows that you are totally exposed. You used my name and built a page for you. And now you try to gimmick in the talk section of my user page, as well as your user page, using 125.22.37.201. Stop this business.

Readers are invited to see how this man worries about Babu Gogineni's (his actual name) reputation in two different Discussion sections, of me and of his own, using the same material. User:S_kollur User:Skollur. Babu Gogineni, you are totally exposed. User:S_kollur

Your msg.
S_Kollur says that you are using his name - it is kinda funny because Kollur is a common surname and many names can start with S. Also, I'll post a note on his talkpage asking him to apologise to you because you have not claimed (AFAIK) that you are Srikant Kollur. If you want, you can request a change in your username through WP:CHU. Best!! --Gurubrahma 12:01, 17 June 2006 (UTC) The contribs you have made now would be retained under the new user name, WP:CHU has the details. As I am busy in the offline world, I may not be in a position to look at the allegations of multiple user ids being used maliciously. You may want to try WP:ANI or WP:INWNB. btw, I've enclosed some links of interest for Indian wikipedians for your reference. --Gurubrahma 12:22, 17 June 2006 (UTC)

Possible violation by you of arbcom decision regarding Sathya Sai Baba
I filed you for possible violation of arbcom decision  Andries 12:00, 28 January 2007 (UTC)


 * I think I made a mistake. You added the link to the indian skeptic with possibly poorly sourced negative information about Sathya Sai Baba to the article Indian CSICOP in Jan. 2006 before the decision of the arbitration committee regarding Sathya Sai Baba in Sept. 2006. So do not worry. You did not violate the arbcom decision. Andries 19:59, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Chaplinstamp.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Chaplinstamp.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self-no-disclaimers tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 01:12, 3 March 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 01:12, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Akovoor.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Akovoor.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 17:40, 30 June 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 17:40, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Mirandacover.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Mirandacover.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 18:48, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Mci-logo1.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Mci-logo1.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:08, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Twe1.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Twe1.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:49, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Twr115.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Twr115.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 07:14, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Ihnfeb05.png
Thanks for uploading Image:Ihnfeb05.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 23:05, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Kerala Yukthivadi Sangham
An editor has nominated Kerala Yukthivadi Sangham, an article which you have created or worked on, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/Dakshina Kannada Rationalist Association and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to address the nominator's concerns but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. — Rankiri (talk) 16:58, 15 August 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Science and Rationalists' Association of India


A tag has been placed on Science and Rationalists' Association of India requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Ged UK  12:23, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Science and Rationalists' Association of India


The article Science and Rationalists' Association of India has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable company. No indication of notability, all sources are self-published.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ged UK  12:26, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Science and Rationalists' Association of India


A tag has been placed on Science and Rationalists' Association of India, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Business for more information.
 * It appears to be a clear copyright infringement of http://esotericotherworlds.blogspot.com/2013/01/science-and-rationalists-association-of.html. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. However, even if you use one of these processes to release copyrighted material to Wikipedia, it still needs to comply with the other policies and guidelines to be eligible for inclusion. If you would like any assistance with this, you can ask a question at the help desk.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Jaaron95 (talk) 18:05, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Science and Rationalists' Association of India for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Science and Rationalists' Association of India is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Science and Rationalists' Association of India until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Jaaron95 (talk) 18:42, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Ramkrishna Bhattacharya


The article Ramkrishna Bhattacharya has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding to your message. (talk to me) (contributions) @ 23:24, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 24
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ramkrishna Bhattacharya, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page University Grants Commission. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:11, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Mohsin Kakorvi


A tag has been placed on Mohsin Kakorvi requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. PohranicniStraze (talk) 19:45, 27 December 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Ramkrishna Bhattacharya


The article Ramkrishna Bhattacharya has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "BLP with inadequate sourcing. Only source is an interview"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. &raquo; Shadowowl  &#124;  talk  11:23, 12 January 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Narendranayak.jpg


The file File:Narendranayak.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "unused, low-res, no obvious use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 14 May 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Third World Network


A tag has been placed on Third World Network, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.
 * It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Iskandar323 (talk) 14:00, 16 October 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Third World Network for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Third World Network is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Third World Network until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Iskandar323 (talk) 08:10, 17 October 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Babu Gogineni for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Babu Gogineni is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Babu Gogineni& until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 09:44, 1 August 2023 (UTC)