User talk:Skoranka

Witaj ! / Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! - Darwinek 14:23, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Image copyright problem with Image:Gdańsk Długi Targ.JPG
Hi Skoranka!

We thank you for uploading Image:Gdańsk Długi Targ.JPG, but there is a problem. Your image is currently missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. Unless you can help by adding a copyright tag, it may be deleted by an Administrator. If you know this information, then we urge you to add a copyright tag to the image description page. We apologize for this, but all images must confirm to policy on Wikipedia.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks so much for your cooperation. This message is from a robot. --John Bot III (talk) 14:42, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

Monitor. WikiProject Poland Newsletter: Issue 1 (April 2011)
Delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 21:22, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

Royal Prussia
Your recent editing history at Royal Prussia shows that you are in danger of breaking the three-revert rule, or that you may have already broken it. An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Breaking the three-revert rule often leads to a block.
 * The article is affected by the Gdańsk (Danzig) Vote. The result is binding on all parties. Violations against the rule established by the outcome of this vote can be reverted exempt from the 3RR rule. ⇒⇒ "For locations that share a history between Germany and Poland, the first reference of one name should also include a reference to other commonly used names, e.g. Stettin (now Szczecin, Poland) or Szczecin (Stettin)."

--IIIraute (talk) 15:46, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Persistent reverts in violation of the outcome of this vote despite multiple warnings may be dealt with according to the rules in Dealing with vandalism.

personal attack
Please do not attack other editors. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. → --IIIraute (talk) 00:20, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
 * You lied in your declaration and that's a fact. You constantly attack other users, accuse them of violations and you're far from "staying cool" but that's OK, right? Skoranka (talk) 00:25, 21 May 2012 (UTC)

Łeba
My family owns a factory near Łeba, employing almost 2000 polish citizens. You are welcome to visit (in case you are looking for work). I have lived for months in the Hotel Neptun in Łeba. It is very beautiful there.--IIIraute (talk) 08:48, 25 July 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for the invite. My user page is not updated. I currently don't reside in Poland. But next time I go, I will let you know in advance. Also, thanks for proper spelling of Łeba and Neptun. Skoranka (talk) 21:57, 25 July 2012 (UTC)

Disruptive editing warning on Meissen
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Meissen. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Dominus Vobisdu (talk) 22:13, 29 July 2012 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Nothing "disruptive" or "unconstructive" about restoring simple, uncontroversial format consistency. Stop blabbering and do something "constructive" yourself. Space Cadet (talk) 22:31, 29 July 2012 (UTC)

I'm used to it already. Skoranka (talk) 22:35, 29 July 2012 (UTC)

SPI
My apologies if my suspicion is unjustified. . Skäpperöd (talk) 10:09, 10 October 2012 (UTC)

Apologies accepted. No biggie. Skoranka (talk) 20:51, 10 October 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Anna Skoranka (self-portrait).png


The file File:Anna Skoranka (self-portrait).png has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "unused, low-res, no obvious use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 15 March 2020 (UTC)