User talk:Skoritz

climate
Hi, I suggest you start adding to climate pages (and we need help!) by first studying the two top articles, Climate change and Global warming. Beneath those two are a branching tree of sub-articles, with a lot of interconnections and overlap. Wanna add something but don't know where? Ask at my talk page! I'd be glad to offer suggestions. Regrettably today I reverted your addition to Avoiding Dangerous AGW. Please see WP:BRD for a description of what being reverted means. If you want to add a general article about mitigation to that article, I at least think it would be an improvement. But we shouldn't give undue WP:WEIGHT to just one approach.NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 19:57, 21 October 2014 (UTC)

Hey, Im not sure if you will be notified of this edit as I am new on the this platform but I would love to get some advice from you. I am doing a project where I will be making 30 minor edits on various wiki pages to bring to light one of the various avenues to combating climate change. This of course is a Cap and Trade system. Do you have any pages to suggest which might be in need of this sort of information? Thanks, Skoritz (talk) 05:03, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
 * See Emissions trading.  Be sure to read WP:EW, WP:POV, WP:TPG for a few important process pointers.   NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 05:37, 24 October 2014 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, but we cannot accept original research. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, and ideas—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 06:10, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

November 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=633264123 your edit] to Internationalism may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 ""s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:05, 10 November 2014 (UTC)
 * An idea which is imperative to successfully combating climate change. As greenhouse gases

Edit war warning
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Scientific opinion on climate change. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 12:28, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.