User talk:SkyBoxx

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. Badgerpatrol 13:07, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

Your edit to South Park
Your recent edit to South Park (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 02:08, 1 December 2006 (UTC) Sorry, I reverted to wrong version SkyBoxx 02:12, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

Picture of Francesco Rutelli added to random pages
It appears as though you've added an image of Francesco Rutelli on several pages (listed at the bottom of the image page:

Image:Francesco_Rutelli_%28EP%2C_5th_term%29.jpg

A few example pages:
 * David Filo (corrected)
 * Charles O. Holliday
 * David_M._Cote
 * Josef_Ackermann

Perhaps this was a copy-paste error while reverting changes.

Bluesmoon 19:54, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. CenozoicEra 03:16, 13 December 2006 (UTC)


 * does anyone else have any problem with him handing out 50+ banstars to random people? --JWJW&#124;Have a nice day :) 07:35, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Yes, I do. Where he has created user pages to add clearly inappropriate barnstars (tireless contributor to an account that has only two edits), I've been tagging those newly-created pages with speedy delete notices along the lines of:
 *  .  Apparently SkyBoxx is trying to create such a bad reputation that he will not be allowed to return.  A very poor way, IMO, to enforce a self-ban.  Either that, or his password has been compromised.  SWAdair 07:41, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
 * There were more pages vandalized than I will be able to handle alone. Any help would be appreciated.  SWAdair 07:43, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Okay, I've gone through all of the "Tireless Contributor Barnstars" he gave out. If the user's list of contributions scrolled off the screen then I didn't stop to count.  I assumed the contributor may be worthy of the award and moved on.  If there were less than 20 edits by the user, I tagged the inappropriate page creation as vandalism.  SWAdair 08:06, 13 December 2006 (UTC)