User talk:Skybon/Archive 2008

Russia new article announcements
Hi there, SkyBon! You can also check out all of the articles concerning Russia at Portal:Russia/New article announcements. Happy editing! KNewman  (talk) 10:26  pm, 16 March 2008, Sunday (1 year, 5 months, 9 days ago) (UTC+3)

Gori, Georgia
Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three  reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may  be blocked for edit  warring, even if they  do not technically violate the three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you. --KoberTalk 19:02, 26 August 2008 (UTC)

Block
You have been blocked from editing for  in accordance with Wikipedia's  blocking policy for  violating the three-revert rule. Please be more careful to discuss controversial changes  or seek dispute  resolution rather than  engaging in an edit war. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the  block by adding the  text  below.

Occupation of Gori
Unless you explain the your NPOV tagging on the article's talk page, the tag's bound to be removed shortly. --Illythr (talk) 12:55, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
 * I will. At first HRW section should be edited and the section should be made  neutral. "HRW described arsons, looting etc..." means that Russians or  Ossetians were really looting, making arsons etc. This is UNACCEPTABLE.  At first this is a lie. At second it is not confirmed neither by Russian  nor by Ossetian and Abkhaz site. It is only confirmed by HRW which  hates Russia and simply refuses to say that 1500+ were killed in the  Tskhinvali and by CNN which looted Rusiya Al-Ayum TV channel  footage from Tskhinvali and represented as footage from Gori. SkyBonTalk\Contributions  15:45, 11 September 2008 (UTC)

FAC withdrawn

 * Featured article candidates/Russia/archive5,  please note the instructions at the top of WP:FAC.   You may consider re-nominating after the significant contributors to the  article agree that it is ready for FAC.  Sandy Georgia  (Talk) 17:07, 20 September 2008 (UTC)

September 2008
Please see this. Although the warnings there states 24 hours, as you have a fairly recent block for 3RR violations,  your next will be for 48 hours. Please refrain from any further reverts in this dispute. Also, do not use rollback in content disputes. Jennavecia (Talk)  18:12, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

Last incident
SkyBon, please revert your last edit in "Ethnic cleansing" article right now. Maybe that will reduce administrative sanctions you are inflicting upon itself. Thanks,Biophys (talk) 15:44, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Just in case you do not know, the placing tag back is also a revert.Biophys (talk) 20:20, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

Notice of editing restriction
Notice: Under the terms of Requests for arbitration/Digwuren, any editor working on topics  related to Eastern Europe, broadly defined, may be made subject to an  editing restriction at the discretion of any uninvolved administrator. Should the editor make any edits which are judged by an administrator to be uncivil, personal attacks, or assumptions of bad faith, he or she  may be blocked for up to a week for each violation, and up to a month  for each violation after the fifth. This restriction is effective on any editor following notice placed on his or her talk page. This notice is now given to you, and future violations of the provisions of this  warning are subject to blocking. — Satori Son 15:50, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

WP:RUSSIA roll call and your input required
Privet. You are receiving this message as you were listed on the membership list of WP:RUSSIA at Wikipedia:WikiProject Russia/Members. Recent times has seen minimal activity within WikiProject Russia, and there is an attempt to re-invigorate the  project and have it become more organised into a fully-fledge  functioning project, with the aim of increasing the quality of Russia-related  articles across English wikipedia.

As we don't know which listed members are active within the project and Russia-related article,  all listed members are receiving this message, and are requested to re-affirm their  active status on Russia-related article by re-adding their username to WikiProject Russia/Members by adding:

#

to the membership list. You may also like to place   on your userpage, as this will also  place you in Category:WikiProject Russia members.

There is also an active proposal on the creation of a single WP:RUSSIA project. The proposal can be viewed at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Russia, and your comments and  suggestions are welcomed and encouraged at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Russia/Proposal.

We all look forward to your continued support of WP:RUSSIA and any comments you may have on the  proposal. --Russavia Dialogue Stalk me 04:31, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

Re:ТВС
Привет SkyBon, что касается рублей, пусть остаются если считаешь что это так  важно,только символа оффициального у рубля нет, просто используй "руб.". Но с флагами и линками в датах придётся оставить всё как есть. В отличии от русской википедии (с которой я немного знаком, хотя и не  очень там активен), флаги здесь - больная тема, было решено не  использовать их в большинстве инфобоксов (спортивных, тв-, радио-каналов и тд). Та же история с датами, линками выделяются только те темы, которые имеют непосредственное отношение к статье, в MOS чётко прописано, что даты в  этот список не попадают (тоже кстати результат достаточно  продолжительных дискуссий). Спасибо сообщение, если есть ещё вопросы - пиши. PS ja nadejus' ty ne vozrazhaesh protiv obrashenija na "tyä.  Ban  Ray  09:13, 31 October 2008  (UTC)
 * Нет, конечно :-).  Насчёт флагов -  понятно, что нежелательно, но так и не понятно, почему. Кто-то у нас  говорил, что это украшательство, хотя я с этим, конечно же, не согласен.  Надеюсь, таких маразмов у нас не будет ;-). А вот насчёт знака рубля... В общем  ЦБ поручили разработать символ рубля (говорили в эфире РЕН ТВ) и, как я  предапологаю, вероятнее всего, выберут именно копию буквы армянского  алфавита "ке" (ք). И ещё: плиз, не надо убирать графу "Зона вещания" :-). SkyBonTalk\Contributions  13:39, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Хорошо, а против флагов я если чесно тоже абсолютно ничего не имею, более того, я достаточно активно отстаивал их  право на существование, но на эту тему уже много чего сказано, если  интересно почитай talk v arhivah WP:MOS  i WP:FLAG. Что касается знака рубля, я не в  курсе, я из российского телевидения сейчас только практически  спортивные каналы нтв смотрю, мог что-то и пропустить, просто с таким символом  никогда не сталкивался, а о том что он вроде как должен появится я ещё  года четыре назад слышал, если не больше.  Ban  Ray  18:31, 31 October 2008  (UTC)

Ещё раз привет SkyBon, по поводу твоего эдита на статье о Путине: для того чтобы получить "А" класс, статья сначала должна пройти  через номинацию на "GA", другими словами, "А" класс - это  промежуточный класс между "GA" и "FA". Ban Ray  13:51, 5 November 2008  (UTC)
 * Привет. На самом деле, я ориентировался именно на то, что статья уже была  номинирована в избранные и, следовательно, должна иметь рейтинг "Pre-FA", т.е. "A". SkyBonTalk\Contributions  14:22, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Не совсем так, номинация ещё не гарантирует статье никакого статуса. Любая статья может быть  номинирована на "GA" и "FA". Если статья проходит номинацию на "GA", то,  при определённых улучшениях, статус статьи может быть поднят до "А"  (без консенсуса и номинации), хотя многие предпочитают пропускать эту  ступень как промежуточную. Статья о Путине была номинирована и на "GA" и  на "FA", но оба раза неудачно, следовательно самый высокий статус  который она может иметь на данный момент - "B class".  Ban  Ray  18:32, 5 November 2008  (UTC)

November 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Image:NASA logo.svg has been  reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Trevor MacInnis (Contribs)  16:39, 24 November 2008 (UTC)