User talk:Skybon/Archive 2011

Orphaned non-free image File:VGTRK logo.svg
 Thanks for uploading File:VGTRK logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 05:11, 5 February 2011 (UTC)

ALSN
I have left Wikipedia because I am sick of fighting deletionists who are unwilling to do constructive work. Do find someone else for your coercion attempts. Or just go for speedy deletion - you do like war and destruction anyway. Guidod (talk) 16:33, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Why do I always have to remind editors about WP:V and WP:OR? Sources first, article second. Any unsourced article is original research until sourced. Clear? Artem Karimov (talk) 16:38, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Common sense, heard of it? Why don't you put a deletion request in the Russian Wikipedia? The best place to look for references would be there. Or in any other Wikipedia that has the article as well. Oh, I forgot, you can not READ RUSSIAN - you just live in Moscow. Wow. And even if you could, you would not transfer any single piece of information from there into the English speaking world. Why should you? Just remove any knowledge, life goes on, and Wikipedia' deletionists do not give a dime for spreading knowledge anyway - the rules is anything, the original goals are completely unimportant. So - what are the goals of Wikipedia? Guidod (talk) 16:52, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
 * You had better stopped ranting about where I live, which languages I speak, which Wikipedia I participate in and so on. Open up WP:BURDEN and read for yourself: burden of evidence lies with the editor who adds or restores material. P.S. And there is quite a difference between knowledge and false information. Artem Karimov (talk) 17:42, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
 * "false information", does that mean you have found an element that is wrong? Well, IF you do have the knowledge THEN you are the best man to correct it. Go ahead, there is an edit button for that case. - oh wait, you do not want to improve the article, you want to DELETE it. Well, so be it, it is all your choice.
 * P.S. rules are made to put people into a gulag without too many people arguing about it because they have a good excuse to do even minimal help on saving anyone's life. Guidod (talk) 19:18, 10 February 2011 (UTC)

March 2011 GAN backlog elimination drive a week away
 WikiProject Good Articles will be running a GAN backlog elimination drive for the entire month of March. The goal of this drive is to bring the number of outstanding Good Article nominations down to below 50. This will help editors in restoring confidence to the GAN process as well as actively improving, polishing, and rewarding good content. If you are interested in participating in the drive, please place your name here. Awards will be given out to those who review certain numbers of GANs as well as to those who review the most. On behalf of my co-coordinator Wizardman, we hope we can see you in March. MuZemike delivered by MuZebot 00:36, 22 February 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Ulitsa Podbelskogo in 2010 fog.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Ulitsa Podbelskogo in 2010 fog.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 05:32, 20 April 2011 (UTC)

In case you weren't aware, Mediawiki outputs both and as proper . --Yair rand (talk) 18:43, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

Declined speedy
Hi, This is to let you know that I declined this speedy deletion. The Yunus Centre is incredibly notable, as the charitable foundation of a Nobel Prize Winner. - Philippe 18:31, 1 May 2011 (UTC)

Yunus Centre
Hello, I found seven reliable sources that discuss the Yunus Centre and its operations in Bangkok, Glasgow and Abu Dhabi. I've linked to them in the AfD debate. Would you like to take another look? Thanks. Cullen328 (talk) 05:53, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

License tagging for File:REN.svg
Thanks for uploading File:REN.svg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 01:05, 11 May 2011 (UTC)