User talk:Skye93

Need your help on Maduro's site, they are removing all of the criticism even though it has sources and was vetted in talk first. Myself and two other editors are being called sock puppets.
 * If the criticism was broad, then it may be considered biased, even if it has tons of sources (that may also be considered biased, especially lapatilla.com. I'll see what I can do regarding to that page. Also, remember to sign your posts! --Yeah 93 (talk) 16:07, 29 March 2013 (UTC)

A 'Barnstar' for You!
My talk only Barnstar for standing up for professional Spanish content and corruption in Latin America -

— Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.252.50.93 (talk) 04:12, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

ANI notice
Hello. There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.--Bbb23 (talk) 11:36, 4 April 2013 (UTC)
 * I believe I answered correctly. I fail to see why you considered my edit an attack. --Yeah 93 (talk) 21:14, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 8
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Venezuelan presidential election, 2013, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Foreign (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:13, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

Discussion at Talk:United States Senate special election in Massachusetts, 2013#Gomez image
You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:United States Senate special election in Massachusetts, 2013. —GoldRingChip 20:35, 21 May 2013 (UTC)

United States presidential election, 2012
Hey, don't just revert edits and use a .Doc file from Dave Wasserman as the only source. If you have a better, more official source than the Federal Election Commission, then I suggest you take it to the Talk page. Or we can wait until the FEC updates their numbers, if they are still missing some votes, and change it then. I have no problem using a reliable source that won't be challenged by other editors, but you need a recognized reliable source and Talk page consensus. I no doubt the Wasserman numbers are the correct ones and that the FEC will update to match it sooner or later. I just don't want other editors coming in and changing them to the House Clerk numbers or some other Government agency that has incorrect info. The FEC numbers almost match the Wasserrman numbers. Thanks. Dave Dial (talk) 18:53, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
 * I just wanted to reflect that the FEC are not updated, while the Wasserman results are. Specially considering it's supported by the fact that, for example, the Official election comission from the state of New York has updated the results from its state, something that has to be changed in the "Results by State" section, and therefore, something that should be reflected in the General results. But it's ok, perhaps we can wait until the FEC updates the results. For the 2008 election they did it during August I believe. Just wanted to show that if we update the results in a state, and not the in the final results, it will be incongruous. --yeah_93 (talk) 20:43, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
 * I understand. I would rather just use the Wasserman results, because they are correct. But when another editor challenges them with a more reliable source, I was forced to use the FEC because it was closest to Wasserman. Sooner or later, they will match. But at least this way, the percentages and such match. Thanks and good luck. Dave Dial (talk) 21:52, 27 May 2013 (UTC)

Bolivarian propaganda article
The Bolivarian propaganda article is now headed for deletion. I was wondering if you could place an input on the subject.--Zfigueroa (talk) 02:26, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
 * I only read the "Dissemination" section, and I must agree that it is extremely biased - even if I agree with the contents. I'll have to read the whole page thoroughly and then I'll place my vote. --yeah_93 (talk) 03:06, 28 April 2014 (UTC)

"Bolivarian propaganda" - Move
The article is up to be moved by Zozs. Please discuss what you think at Talk:Bolivarian propaganda.--Zfigueroa (talk) 05:49, 9 May 2014 (UTC)

2008 Presidential election
Yeah93, with all due respect your WRONG. that picture you keep posting is Obama when he was a STATE SENATOR from Illinois and that's why IT DOESN'T FIT WELL with 2008. For example, in the 1980 and 1984 presidential wikipedia pages, Ronald Reagan's presidential portrait is on both 1980 and 1984 election wikipedia pages. Same with Bill Clinton in 1992 and 1996. Cerretalogan13 (talk) 05:58, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
 * The picture is from 2005, when he was already a US Senator from Illinois. --yeah_93 (talk) 13:21, 7 June 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 7
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Venezuelan presidential election, 2012, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Foreign. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:50, 7 August 2015 (UTC)

RfC
There is a Request for Comment now live on the Template talk:User WikiProject United States presidential elections. Your involvement in WikiProject means you may wish to consider commenting on your preferred outcome for this userbox.  Spartan 7W  §  19:21, 13 August 2015 (UTC)

2015 Venezuelan parliamentary election polls
I was wondering if you could possibly find more polls from July 2015 because ICS threw my graph off considerably. If you find polls from November 2014, December 2014, January 2014 and April 2015 it would be greatly appreciated as well. Thanks for the help you have given already!-- ZiaLater  ( talk  ) 00:26, 1 September 2015 (UTC)


 * From the looks of it Datin Corp may release their July 2015 polls for free soon.-- ZiaLater  ( talk  ) 01:05, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
 * I did try to find many when I submitted the first polls, but I failed to do so. Maybe I'll do a more through research, though I don't think we need so many polls from that far back. --yeah_93 (talk) 01:27, 1 September 2015 (UTC)


 * Ok. I was just trying to find some for my graph so we wouldn't have months that just have one poll. I also like having more than just one poll and ICS in one month so it doesn't throw off the data (if I remove ICS in July 2015, the trend remains similar to other months).-- ZiaLater  ( talk  ) 02:21, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Here is DatinCorp's July poll. I'll let you add the data to the article if you would like to.-- ZiaLater  ( talk  ) 17:24, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks, I already did it. --yeah_93 (talk) 00:06, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

So I noticed that the |La Patilla source and another source from | Prodavinci may have different numbers. Prodavinci looks like it actually cites the September 2015 Venebarómetro (page 41 of 50 on bottom of La Patilla link) while La Patilla maybe uses an older poll. Can you check this out too?-- ZiaLater  ( talk  ) 07:41, 21 October 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:55, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Ven Election results
I hope you know that the election results are not fully finalized right now. Just saw your edit on the article and wanted to make sure you knew.-- ZiaLater  ( talk  ) 06:55, 7 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I know. I guess we'll have to wait for the full results. But for now, let's leave those there, since they clearly show the MUD won. --yeah_93 (talk) 13:34, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia:WikiProject United States/The 50,000 Challenge
--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:41, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

Vote edit
Regarding this edit, please make some change. Your edit makes it look like this is the final vote number. Regards, Sun Creator(talk) 17:10, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

"Unfortunately for you"
A strange comment to make in your edit summary. If you'd have changed the source when you changed the figures, it would have been fine. However, changing sourced information without changing the source can appear to be falsification. I'm not sure why you having a source is unfortunate for me though – perhaps you could elaborate? Also, whilst you changed some of the results table and the source, you didn't correct the figures for all candidates or the invalid votes and left the table as a mixture of the two sources, meaning it didn't add up (I've now sorted this out). The moral of the story: Please be more careful when changing results tables. Cheers, Number   5  7  12:13, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Nah, it was more of a joke than anything. I'll check the numbers again to see if there is any other error left. --yeah_93 (talk) 14:16, 22 February 2018 (UTC)