User talk:Skyfire25

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted (if it hasn't already).

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on. Again, welcome! DefenseSupportParty (talk) 03:42, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion of Steven kim
A tag has been placed on Steven kim requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. DefenseSupportParty (talk) 03:42, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Media One Web
A tag has been placed on Media One Web requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Ironholds (talk) 03:42, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Media One Web
A tag has been placed on Media One Web, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Wuhwuzdat (talk) 03:48, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

February 2009
Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself. Please use the template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion. Wuhwuzdat (talk) 03:48, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Steven kim. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. -  down load  |  sign!  05:21, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Talk:Steven kim. -  down load  |  sign!  05:22, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Sorry, false; it was a talk page. -  down  load  |  sign!  05:22, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

Hello. No, I'm afraid you do not have the right to simply post anything you'd like here. I deleted the article because it had been rightly tagged for deletion as being about an individual who doesn't meet the notability requirements. WP:NOTABILITY sets the bar extremely high for inclusion of individuals. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 07:33, 17 February 2009 (UTC)


 * FYI, no one is abusing power since anything can be reversed. I reviewed the article and it simply doesn't meet the notability requirements.  Furthermore, it appears to promote Mr. Kim's other projects.  You may request that the article be undeleted at Undelete and give the community-at-large an opportunity to reverse the decision.  If it is indeed reversed, no one will delete it again.  --PMDrive1061 (talk) 07:37, 17 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Whoa...hold it. Please do not, under any circumstances, threaten a user in that manner. No need to do so and you may be blocked as a result. As I pointed out, your work is not lost. Several other users tagged the article for deletion and it didn't take me more than a few seconds to come to an agreement. I'll tell you what I'll do to be fair to you and to the community: I'll restore the article and link it to an "articles for deletion" discussion. This is probably the fairest way of determining whether or not it stays. It isn't a majority vote, but a general consensus. Will that satisfy your concerns? --PMDrive1061 (talk) 07:47, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

Not a problem and I'll go you one better. I'll undelete the article and hang an "under construction" template on it. If you can add a couple of verifiable third-party references such as a major media interview and if you make it a little "drier" in tone, it should be OK. The references are all-important. Once you're finished, simply edit out the template. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 07:51, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 07:45, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

All set
I've restored the most recent version of the article. I also added the construction template and a comment on the talk page. You shouldn't have to worry about it being deleted anytime soon. I do delete a lot of material, but I am always willing to assume good faith and reverse a deletion such as this. Good luck. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 07:56, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

The Chippendale's links certainly help. Generally, Myspace, Facebook and the like don't. There really isn't a minimum number of refs needed for inclusion, but if you can add one or two more, it wouldn't hurt. If it were my article, I'd work a bit more on the tone. You aren't on a schedule, so don't worry if you can't finish it right away. I need to sign off in a moment or two, but I can take a look at it tomorrow. Sorry to have upset you. I hope you'll continue to contribute. These misunderstandings sometimes happen and we all do our best to avoid them. Welsome to the club. :) --PMDrive1061 (talk) 08:08, 17 February 2009 (UTC)