User talk:Skylermiles0908

Welcome!
Hello, Skylermiles0908, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent contributions, such as your edit to the page Steven Yeun, have removed content without an explanation. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the sandbox rather than in articles.

If you still have questions, there is a new contributors' help page, or you can and someone will be along to answer it shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia: I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! RedPanda25 23:47, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and how to develop articles
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * Article wizard for creating new articles
 * Simplified Manual of Style

Proposed deletion of Ryan Kemna


The article Ryan Kemna has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp/dated tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Comatmebro User talk:Comatmebro 00:23, 29 November 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of 2020 NBA Draft


A tag has been placed on 2020 NBA Draft requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Comatmebro User talk:Comatmebro 00:27, 29 November 2016 (UTC)

November 2016
Hello, I'm Eric-Wester. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Ryan Kemna— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Eric-Wester (talk) 01:01, 29 November 2016 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Ryan Kemna. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Eric-Wester (talk) 01:05, 29 November 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Dick Yi


A tag has been placed on Dick Yi requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Adamtt9 (talk) 01:26, 29 November 2016 (UTC)

November 2016
Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to being blocked from editing. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 03:51, 29 November 2016 (UTC)


 * This is a continuation of the above warnings. Your edits may be made in good faith, but too many of them are not improvements and require other editors to clean up afterwards. This includes adding unsourced content. Please slow down and read our guidelines in order to contribute here. Thanks, 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 03:51, 29 November 2016 (UTC)


 * I can't revert this edit from a protected article, but the content you added is not supported by the source that's there. Sorry, but if this continues I'll request this account be blocked. 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 03:59, 29 November 2016 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Adrian Peterson. DVdm (talk) 17:01, 29 November 2016 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Vanamonde (talk) 06:23, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

December 2016
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Ian Desmond, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Trut-h-urts man (T • C) 02:12, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Ian Desmond. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 02:14, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

February 2017
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Lance Stephenson. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. —Bagumba (talk) 17:38, 7 February 2017 (UTC)