User talk:Skyring/Archive 12

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Islands
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Islands. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 4 November 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Help talk:IPA/Standard German
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Help talk:IPA/Standard German. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:2019 Hong Kong protests
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:2019 Hong Kong protests. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 9 November 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Maps
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Maps. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 12 November 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:List of countries and dependencies by population
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of countries and dependencies by population. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

Ensuring Integrity Bill
1) Please do not remove content that has sources, without a reason. 2) Do a WP:BEFORE check before nominating an article for deletion. Especially, do not remove the sources/content from an article and then nominate it for deletion so that it will look like it has no sources. Fiamh (talk, contribs) 06:40, 14 November 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:2019 Hong Kong protests
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:2019 Hong Kong protests. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 15 November 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Mottainai
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Mottainai. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 16 November 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 18 November 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Polish–Ukrainian War
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Polish–Ukrainian War. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 20 November 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Polish–Ukrainian War
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Polish–Ukrainian War. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 22 November 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:2019 Hong Kong protests
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:2019 Hong Kong protests. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 24 November 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Peter Arnett
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Peter Arnett. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 26 November 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 28 November 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:List of countries and dependencies by area
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of countries and dependencies by area. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 29 November 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Dwight D. Eisenhower
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Dwight D. Eisenhower. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 30 November 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Battle of Dak To
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Battle of Dak To. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 2 December 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Operation Lam Son 719
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Operation Lam Son 719. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 3 December 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:List of states and territories of the United States
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of states and territories of the United States. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 4 December 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Donji Kraji
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Donji Kraji. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 6 December 2019 (UTC)

Notice of noticeboard discussion
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is "Ending iban from 2016". Thank you. This concerns an appeal of an interaction ban you have with another editor. I'm performing the notification as the editor did not do so, I assume because they were concerned about violating the iban. Nil Einne (talk) 05:53, 8 December 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Hong Kong
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Hong Kong. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 10 December 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Alcohol intoxication
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Alcohol intoxication. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 12 December 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:White Croatia
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:White Croatia. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 14 December 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Crusades
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Crusades. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 15 December 2019 (UTC)

Independent Australia
Noting this edit - I wonder if it might be time to add Independent Australia to the explicitly banned list. I haven't thought them to be a remotely reliable source for a long time, but after an incident this week with them spreading objectively fake news about Jacqui Lambie (in the same column and by the same author you just removed) I feel like the encyclopedia would be better if it was comprehensively purged. The Drover&#39;s Wife (talk) 02:28, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Their journalistic standards are lamentable. Every now and then someone will google for sources and come up with an IA article. It is almost certainly something thoroughly biased, lifted without permission from another source, or complete nonsense. The sort of fringe publication that caters for diehard conspiracy theorists, making money from eyeballs, and pushing sensational tripe. They are on the left and the right, but this one caught my attention years ago.


 * Is there a process to go through? --Pete (talk) 02:37, 16 February 2020 (UTC)

Keep to the topic
Please do not post off-topic material. Keep it focussed. I placed a new section to cap all the toing and froing. Flooding a page with excessive text is disruptive. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 23:32, 6 March 2020 (UTC)

thanks for answer
Hello, Pete. Thank you for your information here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_350#Can_plausible%2C_unsourced_statement_rely_on_sourced_statement%3F. The distinction between something being reasonable yet should be sourced is good and valuable. I did go ahead and add the "citation needed" note that GreenC suggested Greg Dahlen (talk) 19:52, 31 August 2021 (UTC)

Proposed new start to Civilian
I note you have previously commented on the talk page for the Civilian article. There is currently a straw poll open and I would appreciate feedback. Hemmers (talk) 14:28, 4 October 2021 (UTC)

Forums
Personally I would have taken the issue straight to WP:ANI rather than the Edit warring noticeboard. I suspect it will end up there before too long. -- PBS (talk) 19:33, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
 * I think a topic ban is in order and that requires community support at ANI. However, Ed noted the long term behaviour and this latest was a continuation of that in direct contempt of the warning issed at that noticeboard. I'm far from satisfied with the article. I'd like to see the lead trimmed down to a few good sentences where each word carries as much load as it can, and then have more detail and information in the body, adequately sourced, in a logical order. There has been some excellent work on this article in the past by people who know and have a good feel for the topic. Your suggestion of mining previous versions for ideas and phrasing is a very good one. One editor gave several references of other occupations - miners, show-girls, harlots - using the word civilian in the sense of "not one of us". It isn't just the cops; it's discrete communities mimicking the military usage to create an easily-communicated idea of a concept that might have no word in itself. "Non-miner", "non-prostitute" etc. --Pete (talk) 21:07, 25 October 2021 (UTC)

Sydney
There may be a misunderstanding. Stable version is: "Aboriginal Australians have inhabited the Greater Sydney region for at least 30,000 years, and Aboriginal engravings and cultural sites are common throughout Greater Sydney. During his first Pacific voyage in 1770, Lieutenant James Cook and his crew became the first Europeans to chart the eastern coast of Australia, making landfall at Botany Bay" - this is a concise paragraph describing the history summary in lede. User: Aemilius Adolphin / User Poketama added additional information about 3 tribes, insignificant and POV violating - and creating an entire paragraph about the Aborigines. In lede !!! Yes, after new changes, in lede exist whole paragraph about the Aborigines who had no influence on the modern city of Sydney. At the moment, in the intro there is too much content about the Aborigines but in the intro there is not a word about the British people. This is a scandal. British people make up the majority group in both Sydney and Australia. This is totally POV. Stable version was more sensible, less cumbersome, and also more in line with the NPOV principle. Subtropical -man ( ✉  | en-2 ) 00:08, 21 August 2022 (UTC)

ANI
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Poketama (talk) 09:38, 30 August 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Australian Wikipedians' notice board/Indigenous place names
Hello, Skyring. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Australian Wikipedians' notice board/Indigenous place names, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:02, 9 December 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Australian Wikipedians' notice board/Indigenous place names


Hello, Skyring. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Indigenous place names".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 06:44, 9 January 2023 (UTC)

CS1 error on Microsoft Access
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Microsoft Access, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:Qwerfjkl/Botpreload&editintro=User:Qwerfjkl/boteditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:Qwerfjkl&preloadtitle=Qwerfjkl%20(bot)%20–%20Skyring&section=new&preloadparams%5b%5d=&preloadparams%5b%5d=1171291283 report it to my operator]. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 06:00, 20 August 2023 (UTC)
 * A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. ([//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Microsoft_Access&action=edit&minor=minor&summary=Fixing+reference+error+raised+by+%5B%5BUser%3AQwerfjkl%20(bot)%7CQwerfjkl%20(bot)%5D%5D Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:Qwerfjkl%20(bot)/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F1171291283%7CMicrosoft%20Access%5D%5D Ask for help])

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Body of Work (anthology)
Hi! I draftified Body of Work (anthology) because it isn't ready for mainspace yet. While it's a draft you can improve it and add more sources. Once that's done, you can submit it for review. Thanks! BuySomeApples (talk) 03:37, 21 December 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 21
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Outcast (anthology), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Brian Smith. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 21 December 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Body of Work anthology cover image.png
Thanks for uploading File:Body of Work anthology cover image.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:08, 23 December 2023 (UTC)

Independent Australia - pattern of 'forcing' your opinion
Hi Pete. You seem to be making a very large number of edits blanking Independent Australia and any use of it as a reference, and I am concerned that these edits - which look like trying to force your personal opinion despite failing consensus - may be more disruptive than beneficial. As I have previously highlighted, your proposed discussion several years ago to deprecate IA as an acceptable source failed to reach consensus. Your repeated loaded claims of it being a "political opinion blog" despite respected media audit organisations finding IA as highly accurate/reliable with a moderate left-wing bias (which they openly disclose) have lack any evidence or consensus. I can see repeated patterns where you appear to be searching across Wikipedia for any reference of IA, and within minutes of each other, blanking content with the same edit description of "IA not a RS" without any further explanation or evidence that you have tried to look for alternative sources. I would encourage you in good-faith to focus on other ways you can contribute that don't focus on just blanking IA, such as looking for other references yourself, and would recommend you don't continually throw out the same claims of partiality without evidence or recent discussion/consensus. Tim (Talk) 12:53, 3 May 2024 (UTC)

1937 Hong Kong typhoon
Thanks for your edits to that article. I inadvertently changed the spelling to American English, forgetting terms like "harbour" or the date system. Cheers. ♫ Hurricanehink ( talk ) 18:13, 19 May 2024 (UTC)


 * Oh, it's just the style guide. Hong Kong at that time was very definitely British and that's the format any article for that place and time should be in.
 * More important to have the information and sourcing than to worry about the precise formatting. I'm just a nit-picker - what drew my attention was the article in front of the ships. It's OK to say "the USS Constitution", but "the HMS Victory" grates, because the HMS is for His or Her Majesty's ship and "the his" is not proper English. Kind of arcane, but it's in the style guide too.
 * Pete, pedantic personage Pete (talk) 21:56, 19 May 2024 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Body of Work (anthology)
Hello, Skyring. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Body of Work (anthology), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:08, 24 May 2024 (UTC)