User talk:Skyshifter/Archive 2

Disambiguation link notification for January 21
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Persuasion System, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Under the Radar. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 21 January 2023 (UTC)

Issue with Source
Hello, you mention in this edit that the "News/editorial part is reliable", however, Wikipedia's reliable sources page states that Know Your Meme is generally unreliable. Can you explain what you ment by this? TheManInTheBlackHat  (Talk)  16:26, 2 June 2023 (UTC)
 * The reliable source page talks about Know Your Meme entries, which are user-generated (example). The source cited is not an entry, but a news article written by a senior editor, and is not user-generated. Skyshifter   talk  01:34, 3 June 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Dariacore (album) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dariacore (album) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Dariacore (album) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. QuietHere (talk &#124; contributions) 01:42, 13 July 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Twelves
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Twelves you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Spinixster -- Spinixster (talk) 04:21, 4 August 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Twelves
The article Twelves you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Twelves and Talk:Twelves/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Spinixster -- Spinixster (talk) 11:42, 4 August 2023 (UTC)

Twelves
Quando (e se) o artigo de Twelves se tornar um bom artigo, acho que valeria a pena sugerir outra curiosidade para o WP:DYK. Creio que seja possível. RodRabelo7 (talk) 21:48, 13 August 2023 (UTC)


 * Infelizmente não é possível, por WP:DYKCRIT critério 1c. Skyshifter   talk  22:32, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Ah, que pena. Não sabia desse detalhe. RodRabelo7 (talk) 22:57, 13 August 2023 (UTC)

August 2023 Good Article Nominations Backlog Drive reminder
The August 2023 Good Article Nominations Backlog Drive is at the halfway mark, and has seen incredible progress, dropping the backlog from 638 to 359 unreviewed articles -- a 43.7% reduction in only fifteen days! But we still have over two weeks to go, and there are plenty of articles left to review:


 * We've gone from 14 nominations 270+ days old and 65 nominations 180+ days old to 2 and 0 respectively. No more articles will reach 270+ status during the drive, and only three more will reach 180+ if unreviewed, so this is your last chance to get the higher age bonuses!
 * We still have plenty of articles in the 90+ range, but the list is shrinking fast.
 * Some articles need new reviewers, either because they're officially on second opinion or because the original reviews were deleted or invalidated. You can help prevent these articles from waiting longer!
 * While there are starting to be clear favourites for the Content Review Medal of Merit, the field is still very open. A late entrant can still pull an upset to get the most reviews in the drive!

And remember: if you've done reviews, you should log them at the backlog drive page for points, so they can be tracked towards your awards at the end.

Thanks for signing up for the drive, and I hope to see you reviewing! Vaticidalprophet 02:01, 15 August 2023 (UTC)

You have received this message as a participant in the August 2023 Good Article Nominations Backlog Drive who has logged one or no reviews. This is a one-off massmessage. If you wish to opt out of all massmessages, you may add Category:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery to your user talk page.

Your GA nomination of Twelves
The article Twelves you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Twelves for comments about the article, and Talk:Twelves/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Spinixster -- Spinixster (talk) 10:42, 15 August 2023 (UTC)

Regarding the translated quotes in Twelves
I think I might have found a way to resolve the issue. In a recent GA, Sanctioned Suicide, the quote is translated with an at the end to transcribe the original quote. Maybe it can work on this article, but since there are many quotes, you may have to paraphrase some to lower the amount of quotes in the article. Spinixster  (chat!)  01:58, 16 August 2023 (UTC)


 * sorry, I forgot to respond. I still would like to know what policy or recommendation says that this must be done. Skyshifter   talk  17:26, 18 August 2023 (UTC)

Sans (Undertale)
Would be interesting for that article to be a GA. Thou, I don't work at development section since it hard. Greenish Pickle!  (🔔) 01:54, 24 August 2023 (UTC)


 * Would be nice, but I think it's very far from it. Skyshifter   talk  12:17, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Indeed.  Greenish Pickle!   (🔔) 12:55, 24 August 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 13
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited On & On (Cartoon song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Electronic.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 13 September 2023 (UTC)

Fox de Quintal
Comente lá.

Assinado

Fox de Quintal (talk) 16:27, 14 September 2023 (UTC)

DYK for Bomba Patch
theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 12:03, 18 September 2023 (UTC)

File:Gardevoir by jtveemo.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Gardevoir by jtveemo.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 20:43, 25 September 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Pokémon and pornography for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pokémon and pornography is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Pokémon and pornography until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Negative MP1  09:41, 1 October 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of OneShot
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article OneShot you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of TrademarkedTarantula -- TrademarkedTarantula (talk) 01:01, 12 October 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of OneShot
The article OneShot you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:OneShot for comments about the article, and Talk:OneShot/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of TrademarkedTarantula -- TrademarkedTarantula (talk) 05:03, 18 October 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Chris Rock–Will Smith slapping incident
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Chris Rock–Will Smith slapping incident you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of TrademarkedTarantula -- TrademarkedTarantula (talk) 04:02, 19 October 2023 (UTC)

"SSSniperWolf" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=SSSniperWolf&redirect=no SSSniperWolf] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached. Ca talk to me! 11:19, 21 October 2023 (UTC)

Autopatrolled granted
Hi Skyshifter, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the autopatrolled user right to your account. This means that pages you create will automatically be marked as 'reviewed', and no longer appear in the new pages feed. Autopatrolled is assigned to prolific creators of articles, where those articles do not require further review, and may have been requested on your behalf by someone else. It doesn't affect how you edit; it is used only to manage the workload of new page patrollers.

Since the articles you create will no longer be systematically reviewed by other editors, it is important that you maintain the high standard you have achieved so far in all your future creations. Please also try to remember to add relevant WikiProject templates, stub tags, categories, and incoming links to them, if you aren't already in the habit; user scripts such as Rater and StubSorter can help with this. As you have already shown that you have a strong grasp of Wikipedia's core content policies, you might also consider volunteering to become a new page patroller yourself, helping to uphold the project's standards and encourage other good faith article writers.

Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing!  Schwede 66  18:38, 24 October 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Bomba Patch
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Bomba Patch you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 18:43, 28 October 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Bomba Patch
The article Bomba Patch you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Bomba Patch and Talk:Bomba Patch/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 20:02, 28 October 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Bomba Patch
The article Bomba Patch you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Bomba Patch for comments about the article, and Talk:Bomba Patch/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 23:04, 30 October 2023 (UTC)

KYM
From what I can find, even the news entries for KYM are unreliable. See this archive. ― Blaze WolfTalkblaze&#95;&#95;wolf 14:09, 3 November 2023 (UTC)


 * I think the best thing here would be to open another discussion at WP:RSP. I don't think the case at The Amazing Digital Circus can be compared to the one you cited, as it was being used for extremely serious claims in a BLP, and the author apparently didn't have any credentials at all. TADC is an entertainment subject, non-BLP, and the author at least has worked for IGN before. I feel like KYM staff articles would at least be considered situational, usable for entertainment, non-BLP/non-controversial claims, in my opinion. Skyshifter   talk  14:16, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
 * While I do understand, I'm mainly looking at the statement "I don't think that even KYM's staff-written articles have the reputation for fact-checking and accuracy required by WP:RS". Now if this isn't a "staff-written article" then I'd be willing to at least discuss the general reliability of the news articles on KYM. Regardless the source does nothing for the notability of the show since it fails WP:SIGCOV. ― Blaze WolfTalkblaze&#95;&#95;wolf 14:20, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Also I think you mean WP:RSN and not WP:RSP. ― Blaze WolfTalkblaze&#95;&#95;wolf 14:22, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Yes, I linked the wrong page. I will open a discussion there, I think it's the best option here to remove all doubts. Skyshifter   talk  14:23, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Don't worry I did the exact same thing last night. ― Blaze WolfTalk<sub title="Discord Username" style="margin-left:-22q;">blaze&#95;&#95;wolf 14:25, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
 * I saw it. But I want to open a discussion only about KYM. I've used in other articles too, such as Summoning Salt. Skyshifter   talk  14:26, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
 * I wasn't referring to that, I was meaning I has referred to it as WP:RSP rather than WP:RSN last night on the Discord server. ― <b style="background:#0d1125;color:#51aeff;padding:1q;border-radius:5q;">Blaze Wolf</b>Talk<sub title="Discord Username" style="margin-left:-22q;">blaze&#95;&#95;wolf 14:28, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
 * , ah, I'm sorry, I thought you were reffering to WP:RSN. But yeah, I'm still not used to the shortcuts :p also I didn't know there was a Discord server? Skyshifter   talk  14:31, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Nah you're good. And yeah there is, see WP:DISCORD. ― <b style="background:#0d1125;color:#51aeff;padding:1q;border-radius:5q;">Blaze Wolf</b>Talk<sub title="Discord Username" style="margin-left:-22q;">blaze&#95;&#95;wolf 14:34, 3 November 2023 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Donkey Kong Country into Aquatic Ambience. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g.,. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted copied template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 14:45, 16 November 2023 (UTC)


 * Sorry. Skyshifter   talk  15:51, 16 November 2023 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * muito obrigado. É realmente tudo muito estranho. Skyshifter   talk  11:13, 21 November 2023 (UTC)

"$456,000 Squid Game In Real Life!" GAN
It seems that the nomination has been put on hold for over seven days now. Do you have any final opinions on the article? Does it pass or fail?<span id="Davest3r08:1700603659117:User_talkFTTCLNSkyshifter" class="FTTCmt"> — Davest3r08 > : )  ( t a l k )  21:54, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
 * PerfectSoundWhatever is the nominator and main contributor of the article, they should review the changes first. Skyshifter   talk  23:26, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
 * @PerfectSoundWhatever, what do you think then?<span id="Davest3r08:1700609269827:User_talkFTTCLNSkyshifter" class="FTTCmt"> — Davest3r08 > : )  ( t a l k )  23:27, 21 November 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 27
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Virtual Self (EP), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cyber.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 27 November 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: ivory; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; "> Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

December 2023
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Untitled Grand Theft Auto game, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. The reason is explained in edit summary of revertion. Thank you. Exclusive Editor  Notify Me! 15:15, 1 December 2023 (UTC)


 * I believe that was unintentional. Skyshifter   talk  15:33, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Yes. Exclusive  Editor  Notify Me! 15:48, 1 December 2023 (UTC)

Signature
Hope you're well! I noticed that your signature contains the markup. This doesn't appear to be expressly forbidden but it's discouraged per WP:SIGAPP, so I figured you should at least be aware. – Rhain  ☔ (he/him) 02:58, 5 December 2023 (UTC)


 * Thank you, I didn't know that. I'll remove it. Skyshifter   talk  02:59, 5 December 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Virtual Self (EP)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Virtual Self (EP) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of TechnoSquirrel69 -- TechnoSquirrel69 (talk) 01:23, 10 December 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Virtual Self (EP)
The article Virtual Self (EP) you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Virtual Self (EP) for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of TechnoSquirrel69 -- TechnoSquirrel69 (talk) 05:23, 10 December 2023 (UTC)

About your GA review of Nurture (album)
Hey Skyshifter, it's been a couple of days since you checked in at the GA review page, during which time I've addressed all of your comments; is there any update on that front? I sincerely hope that there are no hard feelings between us after the quick-fail and subsequent content dispute, but I understand if you're not in the right headspace at the moment to conduct a review for one of my GANs. Let me know either way! —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 00:30, 15 December 2023 (UTC)


 * no hard feelings at all! I agree that some content there could need adjusting; just unsure to what extent. I've posted it to WP:3O yesterday, so hopefully we can get another opinion soon. In any case I'll probably open a PR before another GAN, as my long-term plan is to nominate it to FA.
 * Regarding Nurture, I actually tend to delay some of my reviews and I'm sorry for that. More comments should be coming very soon. I've skimmed through the article and it should be just minor prose adjustments. Skyshifter   talk  01:11, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your response! I did see your request on 3O as well as the Wikimedia Discord, I hope we can get a response on that as well. No worries about the GA review; I'm in no rush with it, but just wanted to check in to see how it was coming along. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 01:50, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Updates: I'm finally catching up on Nurture GAN. I'm probably finished with the Background section and comments on the next sections should come very soon. Regarding Virtual Self, we got a comment from a user who saw it at 3O. I've added more secondary sources to "Background" accordingly. Since they said the article could be renominated, I've done so following these changes. Skyshifter   talk  23:08, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Hey Skyshifter, a quick note about the header style that you use in your reviews: I'd recommend that you use fifth-level headers instead of semicolons per MOS:PSEUDOHEAD, as this makes pages less accessible for people using screen readers. I've switched them over at Talk:Nurture (album)/GA1, but thought I'd let you know for future reference. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 06:15, 19 December 2023 (UTC)