User talk:Skysmith/Archive 2020

Note re your ideas
Hi. I just found this page that you created: User:Skysmith/Missing topics about History. this looks terrific. thanks for creating this list!!!

I am the new Project Coordinator at WikiProject History. I hope you'll feel free to drop by to discuss your ideas. we are resuming activity and getting WikiProject History up and running again. we would welcome your ideas and insights. please feel free to drop by any time. thanks!! --Sm8900 (talk) 16:45, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Nice. Note that is just the general history-related list - there are others related to specific subjects of history in the my list of potentially missing articles. I also know that some subjects may need just a redirect - Skysmith (talk) 22:19, 16 January 2020 (UTC)

"Equational" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Equational. Since you had some involvement with the Equational redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Paradoctor (talk) 21:30, 10 April 2020 (UTC)

Missing topics about Military History
I've removed dozens of articles from this list, but you keep adding new ones which have been already been written (a quick Google search is enough to locate the article), you even reinserted some that I've previously removed. I really appreciate your work but please be more careful.--Catlemur (talk) 20:36, 16 May 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Monkeyman superhero hoax for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Monkeyman superhero hoax is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Monkeyman superhero hoax until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Eddie891 Talk Work 12:00, 4 August 2020 (UTC)

"Runner-Up" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Runner-Up. The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 August 23 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Regards, SONIC  678  04:40, 23 August 2020 (UTC)

"Telephone communication" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Telephone communication. The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 August 24 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 20:34, 24 August 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of San Theodoros


The article San Theodoros has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing General notability guideline and the more detailed Notability (software) requirement. WP:BEFORE did not reveal any significant coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of 'This article meets criteria A and B because...' and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 06:15, 27 August 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of San Theodoros for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article San Theodoros is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/San Theodoros until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 07:39, 27 August 2020 (UTC) * I have not actually bothered editing these for a while for various reasons due to RL commitments. So this stuff is not popular in States so it is not notable? Granted, in the comment I should have said "other Tintin stories" but I checked and apparently Hachette has bublished most of the series (https://www.hachettebookgroup.com/search/tintin). Did you check the French Wikipedia equivalent (https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/San_Theodoros)? So I suppose you want to remove all of these (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Tintin_locations) as well? - Skysmith (talk) 07:42, 27 August 2020 (UTC)

"UK Alfa 164 Register" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect UK Alfa 164 Register. The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 September 7 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Probably you aren't overly interested... I'm notifying you as back in 2004 you converted this article into a redirect. Thanks A7V2 (talk) 02:41, 7 September 2020 (UTC)

"Mavais for" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Mavais for. The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 October 10 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. DrKay (talk) 13:27, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

"Chlorimide" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Chlorimide. The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 October 11 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. –LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄ ) 06:40, 11 October 2020 (UTC)

"Pentadecenoic" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Pentadecenoic. The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 October 19 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Mdewman6 (talk) 19:35, 19 October 2020 (UTC)

"Drawlatch" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Drawlatch. The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 December 4 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Seventyfiveyears (talk) 13:55, 4 December 2020 (UTC)

"Julian time" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Julian time. The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 December 15 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Soumya-8974 (he) talk contribs subpages 17:29, 15 December 2020 (UTC)

"Market position" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Market position. The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 December 19 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Hildeoc (talk) 20:41, 19 December 2020 (UTC)

"Pakistan-Occupied-Kashmir" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Pakistan-Occupied-Kashmir. The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 January 3 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Soumya-8974 (he) talk con tribs sub pages 18:44, 3 January 2021 (UTC)