User talk:Slaaamdunch

Copying licensed material requires proper attribution
Hi. I see in a recent addition to Greenwich Judgement you included material from a webpage that is available under an Open Parliament Licence. That's okay, but you have to give attribution so that our readers are made aware that you copied the prose rather than wrote it yourself. I've added the attribution for this particular instance. Please make sure that you follow this legal requirement when copying from compatibly-licensed material in the future. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 13:20, 11 August 2017 (UTC)

Faith School
Well done for moving it to Faith School (United Kingdom). Chemical Engineer (talk) 16:45, 9 January 2018 (UTC)

April 2021
Your edit to UK Beach Tour (UKBT) has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Copying text from other sources for more information. – Novem Linguae (talk) 10:48, 12 April 2021 (UTC)


 * Sorry this was flagged as a copyright breach - it wasn't my intention. I was quoting information that is fundamental to the topic. I have now re-added the text but hopefully made it much clearer which parts are quoted. If this can be further improved, please let me know.Slaaamdunch (talk) 11:54, 12 April 2021 (UTC)


 * The text I re-added as a block quote has now been removed too. It is a list the published aims of the organisation I am writing about, so it would not be appropriate to re-word them. They define what the organisation stands for, so I would like to include them if possible. However, I will follow the administrator's instructions and not re-add them.  Can the copyright notice be removed now? Slaaamdunch (talk) 07:58, 13 April 2021 (UTC)


 * I have now removed the copyright tag because the page was reviewed by an administrator (The Earwig) Slaaamdunch (talk) 09:49, 13 April 2021 (UTC)