User talk:Slabcards09

January 2019
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Richard E. Byrd, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. - wolf  10:25, 26 January 2019 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Pixonic. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. - wolf  10:28, 26 January 2019 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Pixonic, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. - wolf  10:28, 26 January 2019 (UTC)

Pixonic
The pixonic page I edited contained false and libelous allegations.

I will continue to change it as long as it contained no factually inaccurate information.

Thanks Slabcards09 (talk) 11:26, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Please, feel free to try and continue to improve and expand that article (the addition of reliable sources would be good), but ensure your edits are within the confines of Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Also, please ensure you attach edit summaries with all of your edits. Thank you. - wolf  13:24, 26 January 2019 (UTC)