User talk:Slaney2

Ways to improve Herbert Theodore Thomas
Hi, I'm Dreambeaver. Slaney2, thanks for creating Herbert Theodore Thomas!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Hi, I am confused as to who you are referring to in the second paragraph. It seems out of place, to say the least.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Dreambeaver (talk) 15:33, 13 August 2013 (UTC)

Hi Guys, I'm sorry I'm new to this so have no idea how I am supposed to talk. I have absolutely no doubt that the article will improve when I find out how to include photographs and archival sources. With regard to original research the only original inclusion is in paragraphs 2 & 3 of the introduction, all the rest is historical fact as far as I am aware. There are some dates to be verified such as the DFC awarded to G.M. Thomas but that is work in progress. Slaney2 (talk) 18:06, 13 August 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Herbert Theodore Thomas


The article Herbert Theodore Thomas has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * This is entirely WP:original research.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. noq (talk) 15:48, 13 August 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Herbert Theodore Thomas for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Herbert Theodore Thomas is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Herbert Theodore Thomas until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. noq (talk) 17:54, 14 August 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Herbert Theodore Thomas


A tag has been placed on Herbert Theodore Thomas requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Dea db  eef  19:51, 14 August 2013 (UTC)

Hi Guys, Perhaps if you let me develop the page and get to grips with all the tools and get all the resources in then you might find the subject important and/or significant. The article I linked to has been left alone but I'm guessing all newbies probably get this because of syntax and formatting issues. So what I'll do is take it down, work on it get it right with a bibliography all the cross references articles books and reviews and then try again. Thanks for your patience understanding and gentle use of languageSlaney2 (talk) 20:53, 14 August 2013 (UTC)