User talk:Slartibartfast1992/Archives/2007/November

Redirect


has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing! Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message. Hello again. :) I noticed you had a redirect from my IP page to my user account. I changed it back so that people wouldn't be confused if they were redirected to a page they had no clue about.  Just wanted to let you know! Midorihana(talk)(contribs) 09:20, 27 October 2007 (UTC)


 * I appreciate the gesture, though. Midorihana(talk)(contribs) 00:44, 28 October 2007 (UTC)

Thanks! Midorihana(talk)(contribs) 00:51, 28 October 2007 (UTC)

What is your dangerous idea
I was wondering if you could show me the layout you mentioned in the article's talk page. You can edit my sandbox here. Thanks! Midorihana(talk)(contribs) 06:05, 5 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Alright, looks good, thanks. I'll see if I can find the time to make a list of the ideas.  Midorihana(talk)(contribs) 04:25, 6 November 2007 (UTC)


 * I had the time, so I made a list of the ideas in my sandbox. It's a grand total of 55 ideas, so the list needs to be generalized more for inclusion in the article. Midorihana(talk)(contribs) 22:12, 11 November 2007 (UTC)


 * I probably shouldn't post replies to notes on my page to yours, so I'll just respond on my talk page. Midorihana(talk)(contribs) 00:59, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for categorizing the ideas, I categorized the uncategorized ones. I also moved some of the comments on this page to my talk page for readability. Midorihana(talk)(contribs) 00:35, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

Copper(II) hydroxide
Yeas, sorry I was so slow. The last couple of months have been very busy- my Wikipedia contributions have been my lowest in years. Anyway, I did a few tweaks to the article and assessed it. It looks generally like the main bases have been covered, so I judged it to be a B.

I took out the "how to" information - an encyclopedia isn't supposed to include recipes for things (WP:NOT). As for work left to do on the article, I think the main thing would be to add a structure and properties section -crystal structure, that sort of thing. I also noticed that Chris's reaction scheme had an error in it, I pointed this out to him here. If he doesn't fix it (he only contributes occasionally), let me know and I'll redo it - but I thought he might prefer to do it himself. Let me know if I can help you out further - my life (hopefully) won't be permanently this busy! Cheers, Walkerma 02:43, 31 October 2007 (UTC)


 * I think it would need a lot more work before it would make it as a good article. There are a lot of assertions in there that need clarifying and referencing, such as (in the opening paragraph), "quite likely a mixture..."  I'm sure this is known, so either it is or it isn't; if it is the case, we need to cite a reliable source, if it isn't, it is wrong and we need to remove it.  That sort of thing could apply.  If Chris is not around, I may be able to locate the sources of the organic stuff he added, and maybe even to add to it.  But probably not until the Christmas break...! Thanks, Walkerma 13:18, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

Article assessment - American Inventor
As requested here I've assessed American Inventor. I've included a summary of my thinking here.--Opark 77 14:03, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for reverting that funny vandalism on my user page... The funny thing is, I don't think I've encountered that IP before. Midorihana(talk)(contribs) 05:46, 30 November 2007 (UTC)