User talk:SlashinatorX

"Vandalism"
I don't think you know what vandalism is. What you are doing, willfully ignoring WP:MOS to force undesired changes on articles, is far more in line with WP:VANDALISM than my reverts of your edits. This situation is nothing like what the admirable Temple Grandin deals with. This situation has nothing to do with Jimbo Wales being "afraid" of change. Wikipedia doesn't seek to change the way things are done, it seeks to reflect existing customs and standards and relies on verifiable information. (By the way, you need to learn how to insert a citation if you want to add information to Wikipedia. Your edits will be challenged and likely removed, as you've probably discovered, if you don't include a citation.) This isn't the right place for your crusade against traditional and generally accepted grammatical conventions. Oh, and may I recommend that if you're going to be on the internet, you should probably drop the attitude that everything done differently from the way it's done in the United States is "wrong". That kind of behavior is going to get you nowhere quickly. -Kudzu1 (talk) 22:42, 13 December 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 23
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Urolagnia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Welsh (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:04, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:04, 24 November 2015 (UTC)