User talk:SlaveToTheWage/Archive 7

Disputed fair use rationale for File:Villeroy & Boch logo.svg
Thank you for uploading File:Villeroy & Boch logo.svg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:
 * That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
 * That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 15:56, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
 * ✅ --STTW (talk)  11:32, 3 May 2009 (UTC)

TUSC token 2f35492176fe9397d1650cf27f49190f
I am now proud owner of a TUSC account! —Preceding unsigned comment added by STTW (talk • contribs) 18:18, 10 May 2009 (UTC)

Arc de Triomphe, a symbol of genocide
Hi SlaveToTheWage. I saw you removed a section from Arc de Triomphe. This section mentions a current legal development at the highest judiciary instance in Spain. It's well documented and relevant to the article. This legal action is supported by descendants of victims of genocide by Napoleonic Troops. Please explain why you removed this information. Thanks (Niaps (talk) 15:04, 16 May 2009 (UTC)).
 * Need appropriate sources as per WP:SPS. --STTW (talk)  15:37, 16 May 2009 (UTC)

Hi STTW. Thank you for your note. I have added more sources, from several historians. I have more, let me know if this suffices. Thanks again. (Niaps (talk) 15:55, 16 May 2009 (UTC))

Speedy deletion nomination of Sabri Ergun
A tag has been placed on Sabri Ergun requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Aadagger (talk) 12:28, 4 September 2009 (UTC)