User talk:Slaylordaniel13

September 2014
Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Shake It Off (Taylor Swift song). Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. ''The song has not been certified by the RIAA, selling 500,000 copies does not mean it is certified. '' — Indian: BIO  · [ ChitChat  ] 14:00, 1 September 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=627237210 your edit] to The Red Tour may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 03:23, 27 September 2014 (UTC)
 * File:RedStLouis.png|thumb|right|upright|Swift performing in St. Louis, Missouri during the

Reference Errors on 3 September
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/RBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/RBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=ReferenceBot%20–%20&section=new report it to my operator]. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:25, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
 * On the Red (Taylor Swift song) page, [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=624007145 your edit] caused a broken reference name (help) . ([ Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:ReferenceBot/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F624007145%7CRed (Taylor Swift song)%5D%5D Ask for help])

September 2014
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at This Is How We Do, you may be blocked from editing. — Indian: BIO  · [ ChitChat  ] 12:16, 10 September 2014 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Shake It Off (Taylor Swift song). — Indian: BIO  · [ ChitChat  ] 15:02, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

October 2014
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove the maintenance templates from Wikipedia articles without resolving the problem that the template refers to. — Indian: BIO  · [ ChitChat  ] 10:30, 2 October 2014 (UTC)

This is the last time I'm writing this, DONOT add unsourced and false certifications and content to "Shake It Off (Taylor Swift song)". I will make sure that your editing priviledges are taken away if you continue once more. If you have any question come and ping me in my talk page or the article's talk page but Wikipedia has zero tolerance policy on vandals and unsourced content addition. You have been warned countless times on this. Next time it will be a block. — Indian: BIO  [ ChitChat  ] 06:29, 16 October 2014 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Acalamari 09:48, 21 October 2014 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at 1989 (Taylor Swift album). — Indian: BIO  [ ChitChat  ] 10:49, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

November 2014
This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at 1989 (Taylor Swift album), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. — Indian: BIO  [ ChitChat  ] 13:51, 1 November 2014 (UTC)

Hello, Slaylordaniel13. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:


 * Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
 * Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
 * Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).
 * Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies. Note that Wikipedia's terms of use require disclosure of your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you.  Snuggums ( talk  /  edits ) 16:00, 1 November 2014 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.


 * Please take into consideration the warnings that other editors have given you. If you continue the behavior that has led to your so-far two blocks, you risk being blocked again - possibly indefinitely. Acalamari 16:02, 1 November 2014 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.


 * I've blocked you for a month for the same reasons as before. If you continue to add original research and false certifications to articles once your block expires, your next block will be indefinite. Acalamari 18:29, 14 November 2014 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation
— Indian: BIO  [ ChitChat  ] 12:02, 15 November 2014 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation
— Indian: BIO  [ ChitChat  ] 04:47, 14 December 2014 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation
— Indian: BIO  [ ChitChat  ] 17:45, 19 January 2015 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation
— Indian: BIO  [ ChitChat  ] 12:40, 5 June 2015 (UTC)