User talk:Slazenger/Archive 3

Rollback
Hello, following a review of your contributions, I have enabled rollback on your account. Please take note of the following:
 * Rollback gives you access to certain scripts, including Huggle and Igloo, some of which can be very powerful, so exercise caution
 * Rollback is only for blatant vandalism
 * Having Rollback rights does not give you any special status or authority
 * Misuse of Rollback can lead to its removal by any administrator
 * Please read Help:Reverting and Rollback feature to get to know the workings of the feature
 * You can test Rollback at New admin school/Rollback
 * You can display the userbox or the  top icon on your user page
 * If you have any questions, feel free to ask me. Reaper Eternal (talk) 21:22, 12 December 2011 (UTC)

Invisible Hand
If you had bothered to check, you'd have seen that I stated the text was patent nonsense and removed it, exactly as suggested for articles of decent length in the relevant guideline. That sort of botched, lofty prose with misused but fancy-sounding vocabulary and no actual meaning is exactly what WP:NONSENSE is for. It looks like it's going to say something and then it doesn't. On top of that, the section lacked citations and had a block quote at the end that that was supposed to demonstrate abuse of the term to the reader in and of itself. Could justify deleting it as OR as well, if you'd prefer.

I am not the vandal with previous edits on this IP. Reverting your revert and asking that you pay more attention to anon edits. 76.127.200.213 (talk) 01:34, 14 December 2011 (UTC)

Thanks
I was trying to figure out how to fix the problem with the template: history of Greek art on the byzantine art page. I don't know if it was you that fixed the byzantine art page, but thanks either way. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Spensermolnar (talk • contribs) 07:20, 14 December 2011 (UTC)

Hey, I was wondering how you guys fixed it? It must have been an error with in the history of greek art template? Spensermolnar (talk) 08:45, 14 December 2011 (UTC)

London, Ohio Motto edit
As I stated to the last gentleman who reverted my edit of London Ohio's Motto, this motto has been said for years in my hometown. My great grandmother said it, my grandmother said it, the principle of my elementary school said it! If you are going to flag this as vandalism then please do some research before passing judgment!! Have you ever been to my home town London? Have you walked down High Street and heard the people speak? This is our motto! I moved away years ago and this page is special to me, please don't foul it up with your unjust finger pointing. Do the research. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.197.169.16 (talk) 04:47, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Responded on your talk page in regards to the lack of citation for your edits.   --Slazenger   (Contact Me - Contribs)  04:51, 15 December 2011 (UTC)

Thank you for the explanation. That helps a lot. I will get on finding some form of documentation for the motto. Thank you for the help! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.197.169.16 (talk) 04:58, 15 December 2011 (UTC)

Your attention needed at Changing_username/Usurpations
User:Slazenger's edits are considered "unsubstantial", therefore you have the opportunity to Changing username/Usurpations! Go, go, go! Hope Tymun → Slazenger is successful! -- J (t)  02:13, 19 December 2011 (UTC)


 * No, by the 23rd you will be User:Slazenger! -- J (t)  02:41, 19 December 2011 (UTC)

Proof for Request of Usurpations for SUL
I am requesting a rename on Commons, fa.wikipedia, bg.wikipedia, tr.wikipedia, and es.wikipedia. My current name on most of these projects (through creation of my original SUL) is Tymun. --Slazenger  (Contact Me) 05:22, 24 December 2011 (UTC)

CBC
Hi. Do you seriously believe the CBC to be "fair & balanced", and *not* exhibit a notorious liberal bias? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.165.41.248 (talk) 06:46, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
 * While it may be true that the CBC is biased, is that information pertinent to the article? The issue I see with including information like that is that it shows bias on the part of the encyclopedia.  Unless CBC touts itself as a liberal network, there is no reason for mention of it to be made as non-chalantly as you put it.  If you can find an article, journal, or other respected reference that solidly shows evidence that the CBC is biased (and it will add to the understanding of the article), by all means include it.  But putting unsupported claims in the article in the manner you did does not contribute to the article.  Please let me know if you have any other concerns or questions!   --Slazenger  (Contact Me) 06:54, 25 December 2011 (UTC)

I'm sorry
I'm sorry for abusing the CSD use, Is there anything else I can do, if an article has little detail? EminamaDron Feel free to talk to me My Contributions 06:55, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Articles that contain little detail should be tagged for expansion, etc. As such, it will encourage people to add more content to the article.  Some links you may want to look over:  CSD, Stub, and Policies_and_guidelines.  Let me know if you need anything.  --Slazenger  (Contact Me) 07:02, 26 December 2011 (UTC)

Quick qeustion
Is there a template to play youtube videos?? If there is then, can you tell me what it is because I really need it for my article! EminamaDron Feel free to talk to me My Contributions 07:34, 26 December 2011 (UTC)

usurpation @ trwiki

 * hi, usurpation @ trwiki has been granted. keep up the good work. --Mskyrider (talk) 14:47, 28 December 2011 (UTC)