User talk:SleepCovo

List of female Members of the London Assembly
Hi SleepCovo

Please see my comment at Talk:List of female Members of the London Assembly.

Per WP:BRD, please explain your reasons for reverting, and discuss them to try to reach a consensus. Please do not assume that you or any other editor WP:OWNs a page. -- Brown HairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 21:44, 27 May 2015 (UTC)


 * How about you explain why you think your way is better before you make your changes as at the moment you make a change without consulting anyone! Rather hypocritical tbh! SleepCovo (talk) 21:47, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
 * SleepCovo, As I have explained to you probably a dozen times, the way WP works is WP:BRD:
 * someone make a WP:BOLD edit
 * another editor disagrees, and reverts it
 * they discuss it to try to reach a WP:consensus
 * Now, please go to Talk:List of female Members of the London Assembly and explain the reasons why think that it is inappropriate for the list to be sorted by surname. -- Brown HairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 11:53, 28 May 2015 (UTC)

Belated welcome!
--Seagull123 (talk) 23:01, 29 May 2015 (UTC)

Redundant content forking
Hi SleepCovo

Please do not create content forks, articles which duplicate an existing page.

You created List of female Members elected to the House of Commons of the United Kingdom as content fork of List of female Members of the House of Commons of the United Kingdom. The page you created appears to have identical content, and has an almost identical title (it adds only the word "elected", which is superfluous because all MPs are elected).

I have therefore redirected the new page to the existing List of female Members of the House of Commons of the United Kingdom.

I think you may have done this because of our disagreements at Talk:List of female Members of the House of Commons of the United Kingdom, but per WP:REDUNDANTFORK, that is an unacceptable type of content forking. Please discuss your concerns at at Talk:List of female Members of the House of Commons of the United Kingdom, and try to reach a WP:CONSENSUS. -- Brown HairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 12:18, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

Categorizing photos
Greetings! I see that you've uploaded several photos of members of the US Congress to Commons. It'd make the photos much more available to other Commons users if you'd categorize them when you upload them. This isn't difficult: you can either do it while you're uploading, or by editing the file after you've uploaded. I've taken care of File:BradAshford2015.jpg, by creating the new category Commons:Category:Brad Ashford for him, then putting that into higher categories based on those for other members of Congress. You might want to go through some of your recent uploads and do likewise. If you've got any questions about the process, drop me a note at my Wikipedia talk page (which I check much more often than my talk page at Commons); I'll be glad to give you what help I can. — Ammodramus (talk) 15:55, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

June 2015
You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Sockpuppet investigations/Marquis de la Eirron. Thank you. NebY (talk) 13:29, 13 June 2015 (UTC)

Introducing the new WikiProject Hampshire!
Greetings!

I am happy to introduce you to the new WikiProject Hampshire! The newly designed WikiProject features automatically updated work lists, article quality class predictions, and a feed that tracks discussions on the 2,690 talk pages tagged by the WikiProject. Our hope is that these new tools will help you as a Wikipedia editor interested in Hampshire.
 * Browse the new WikiProject page
 * Become a member today! – members have access to an opt-in notification system

Hope to see you join! Harej (talk) 20:42, 10 July 2015 (UTC)