User talk:Slgrandson/Waterbury archive 2

Sorry
Sorry, I thought that you were Roxyr, cuz whenever I went to his page, I always saw the link to your page and thought u two were the same user. My bad. DeathGodDragon EDGE 21:20, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

Tom Wright (Young actor) )
This article was a non-notable biography according to the criteria set out in WP:BIO. (aeropagitica) 17:09, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

BLAST it!
You succeed in tagging User:BAMEXP SECONDS before I do... 68.39.174.238 07:30, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

Saturnalia
You said there might be a copyvio, however, the page you linked to made no mention of Saturnalia. Furthermore, a majority of that article is taken from a lecture and its handout, given by Professor Woolf at the University of St Andrews...whom I did obtain permission from before using. Novium 11:45, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

AIV
No problemo. Meh, down with the vandals - mind you, all they have are a few minor problems that can be treated with kind words. Cheers, Moreschi Deletion! 19:18, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for nominating me as an admin on Dhivehi Wikipedia
Dear Slgrandson, it is very nice of u to nominate me as an admin on Dhivehi Wikipedia. Thank you very much!! you can leave a comment on my user talk page. Thank u once again!! --Glacious 11:19, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

My Request for Adminship
 

Thanks for your support on my successful Request for Adminship  (final result 78 Support /0 Oppose / 1 Neutral) I have now been entrusted with the mop, bucket and keys. I will be slowly acclimating myself to my new tools over the next months. I am humbled by your kind support and would certainly welcome any feedback on my actions. Please do not hesitate to contact me. Once again, many thanks and happy new year! All the best, Asterion talk 16:01, 27 December 2006 (UTC)

Arthurian films
I never doubted you edited in good faith, but I reverted you for two reasons. First, that page is for films that are actually based on the Arthurian legend, i.e. retellings, adaptations, etc., not just for films that happen to reference it. Second, the Stone of Scone has nothing to do with the Arthurian legend at any rate, and the Arthur reference was trivial.--Cúchullain t/ c 02:56, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

NPWatcher approval
You've been approved to use NPWatcher. Please give me any feature requests or bugs. I'm also happy to help if you have any problems running the program, or any questions :). Before you run the program, please check the changelog on the application page to see if I've made a new release (or just add the main page (here) to your watchlist).  Finally, enjoy! Mart inp23  19:41, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

Pound Puppies
Hey there, I copyedited the plot and didn't understand this "However, they fall into McNasty's trap, and the villain's henchmen take care of them right away. Cooler acts as a cat to save the Purries, and the three of them are thrown outside. Big Paw brings them back to town to stop the evil trio, as the trio's truck heads to the Pound." The trap needs to be specified. I assumed that this was when they were transformed, but is that right? Please look at what I did and ask if you don't understand why I made a change. It's nearly 150 words shorter, but it could probably be cut down even more.--Supernumerary 03:09, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
 * I've turned it into a more sensible sentence: "Later, McNasty's henchmen transform the Puppies into guard dogs, save for Cooler." Tomorrow, we will start dealing with every redlink in the article in order to satisfy WP:GAC. --Slgrandson (page - messages - contribs) 23:20, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

Canals in Cheshire
Hi,

You have tagged my new page Canals in Cheshire as requiring cleanup. Could you please give some indication as to what particular points you were refering to?

Thanks Salinae 12:40, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

Sorry I'm late
Hey I'm sorry about the whole user page edit thing, yes that was my IP at the time but i have no idea who gnome is, sorry it took me seven months for this but i guess this is the first time i've logged in since then. \/\/@&#124;&#124;@(3 03:59, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

Newyorkbrad's RfA
Thank you for your support on my RfA, which closed favorably this morning. I appreciate the confidence the community has placed in me and am looking forward to my new responsibilities. Please let me know if ever you have any comments or suggestions, especially as I am learning how to use the tools. Best regards, Newyorkbrad 19:07, 21 January 2007 (UTC)

Annie Awards
I'm sending a photographer to the Annie Awards this Sunday, on behalf of Wikinews. I'm giving the photographer a sheet of people to lookout for, including John Lasseter, Bill Plympton, Genndy Tartakovsky, Andreas Deja, and a bunch of voice actors. Anyone on the nominee list that you ID as being really important to get a pic of? -- Zanimum 22:05, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

Regarding "File shadowing"
I started the "File shadowing" article because it was a "red link" in an article I was reading and I didn't know anything about it. Hence, that is why it had some reference links and a stub template. I was hoping the stub template would encourage someone else to add some content. Nobody did, my article just got marked for speedy deletion. I added some (admittedly not much) content, leaving the stub template on the page, again hoping that someone else will pick up that ball. Please remember that some contributors have jobs, families, and other responsibilities and interests, which make the 5 day deletion warning seem like a giant "go away, you are not welcome here" message. It would be nice if you and your fellow editors/administrators would ease up on the "too short"/"not enough content" articles. It is sometimes difficult to scrape together enough time in one sitting to write a proper article. Returning to work on it, only to find it was speedily deleted, is quite disheartening. --JulieC 01:22, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

RfA response
If you feel so sorry for me, don't oppose. I don't understand it. Everyking 03:04, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:GreatWishingStar.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:GreatWishingStar.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 03:24, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Care Bears and campers in lake.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Care Bears and campers in lake.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 03:27, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:John Dawn and Christy.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:John Dawn and Christy.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 03:30, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:CB cubs waiting on rainbow.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:CB cubs waiting on rainbow.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 03:31, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Sliding harmony bear.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Sliding harmony bear.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 03:31, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Colour reversed Star and Heart Buddy.JPG)
Thanks for uploading Image:Colour reversed Star and Heart Buddy.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 03:31, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Purple CB Cubs on seesaw.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Purple CB Cubs on seesaw.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 03:32, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:True and Noble prepare to stare.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:True and Noble prepare to stare.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 03:32, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Harmony and Tenderheart prepare for party.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Harmony and Tenderheart prepare for party.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 03:32, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

Popups
Just read your message to Lupin, the problem with popups is that theses a new version installed that isn't compatable with ie. Simply remove popups from your monobook.js and put the version in which I'm posting below as it will allow you to use the previous version that works. You must clear your cache afterwards by holding down ctl and F5 together. Hope this helps! Ryan Postlethwaite See the mess I've created or let's have banter 21:26, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

// User:Lupin/popups.js

document.write(' ');

1985 in animation
Sorry for the long-delayed response...

I'm just not sure where to start, really; part of me thinks that this is a good idea, while another part doesn't. I've never used the "year in film" articles myself, because they tend to be very incomplete and lack any concrete rules for what should be mentioned in the "list of released films" or not so what ends up happening is that systematic bias creeps in; the most popular films of wikipedia editors are the ones that are mentioned in the list, which is not comprehensive yet has no good criteria for inclusion.

So basically, I'm not so sure that the "films released" table is such a good idea unless you find a way to remove the systematic bias and have very strict criteria for which films should be mentioned in it. Doubtless you've seen already that the year 1985 on the list of animated feature-length films has tons of releases that are not mentioned in your article right now. Nor should they all be mentioned, I think, because that would take up a lot of space and would be somewhat redundant.

I can think of a few usefull things that such an article could provide, though:
 * a list of the top winners of the major animation festivals for that year
 * mentioning of any technological or artistic (innovative use of existing technology) advancements in the field of animation - backed with citations.
 * important events in the lives of significant figures (maybe)

I think that might also be a good idea to write separate historical overviews for different regions of the world (example). It shouldn't be a chronology like that website, I think, but a general written overview of the most significant developments in that part of the world for that year. This will allow us to go into more detail than specific "history of animation" articles. I think that the "year in animation" articles, contrary to the "year in film" articles, should be actual articles about what happened in that year (general trends and specific events) rather than simply lists of information. Of course it'll take a lot more work and time, but will ultimately be a lot more usefull.

Anyway, just throwing ideas out. What do you think? Esn 20:39, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

WBFAN
Hi - I noticed this edit. The reason the star was duplicated is because the article was successfully nominated twice (and demoted in between). The next time I regenerate the page, it will come back. -- Rick Block (talk) 00:21, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

RfA thanks
Hi, Dylan. Just getting round to thank everyone for their support at my RfA. It was an unexpected level of support for me and is, indeed, humbling. Thanks again. Bubba hotep 21:28, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

Age category
Hello! If you are receiving this message, that means that your user page is in a specific year category. Per a recent user-category per deletion, all specific year categories are to be deleted. If you wish to continue using year categories, you have two options: If you wish, you may do both. Hopefully, this change in categorization will be quick and painless. Happy editing! --An automated message from MessedRobot 13:23, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Using an age group category, such as Category:Wikipedians in their 30s
 * Using a decade category, such as Category:Wikipedians born in the 1970s.

Re: Dr. MD Sleiman Sami Salibi
GET A LIFE! THAT'S MY COUSIN YOUR TALKING ABOUT AND THAT ARTICLE WILL NOT GET DELETED! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Esalibi (talk • contribs).
 * Sorry if your page got deleted, but per WP:Bio, WP:Prod, WP:Vanity and this AFD debate (which, by the way, I started), such memorials do not belong on Wikipedia or elsewhere on Wikimedia. If you would like to proceed and have not done so already, please register at PBWiki.com and put the content on your new site. And don't even try to re-create it, otherwise it will be salted. --Sl g randson (page - messages - contribs) 18:29, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

Re: Your tool
Hi there. I did some cleaning the other day, and one more today. It is possible Internet Explorer is not fetching the new version. Try doing a full refresh with CTRL+F5. I just tried it from work (the computer there has Internet Explorer) and worked fine. Please do tell me if you still continue to have problems, and thanks for letting me know! -- ReyBrujo 01:57, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

My RfA
Thank you for your support in my recent successful RfA. --Anthony.bradbury 14:52, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

Wanna go?
 Yanksox would like to nominate you to become an administrator. Please visit Requests for adminship to see what this process entails, and then contact Slgrandson to accept or decline the nomination. A page has been created for your nomination at Requests for adminship/. If you accept the nomination, you must formally state and sign your acceptance and answer the questions on that page. Once you have answered the questions, you may post your nomination for discussion, or request that your nominator do so. Yank sox 23:18, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Glad to see that you accepted. Yank sox  01:58, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Sorry it didn't work out quite well. We'll get 'em again. Yanksox 21:09, 4 May 2007 (UTC)