User talk:Slgrandson/Waterbury archive 3

Vandalism?
Slgrandson, I am Onion6. I got a messaage saying that i made some vandalism to the article Disney Channel. What? I think i remember making some minor edit, but nothing to extreeme. In fact, i think it was one letter. I'd like to see what i did wrong. Please know that whatever i did, i didn't do it on perpous. Ok, well, that's it.

--Onion6 21:36, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

PS I don't think i was signed in at the time.

PoliceStory-2
Hello, I see there's a template:sofixit concerning my suggestion. I have been accused enough of vandalism, that I will not fix many things. Just recently I fixed a redirect into a dab page and was accused of vandalism, before it was retracted. Before that I corrected a double redirect and was accused of vandalism. I'll leave suggestions, other people can fix it. 132.205.44.134 21:47, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

My RFA
Hello I was just wondering why I recived a message saying that my IP address has vandilized a artical and I have never been to the artical that was stated in the message?

Redirect of Better Late Than Never(phrase)
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Better Late Than Never(phrase), by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Better Late Than Never(phrase) is a redirect to a non-existent page (CSD R1). To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Better Late Than Never(phrase), please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. CSDWarnBot 08:32, 16 October 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Furlings.JPG)
Thanks for uploading Image:Furlings.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 20:14, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of ZIZ
A tag has been placed on ZIZ requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Merenta 19:32, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 20:01, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

Merry Christmas!


is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Don't overdo it on the fudge!

Spread the Holiday cheer by adding to their talk page with a friendly message.

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:CBMI soundtrack cover.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:CBMI soundtrack cover.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:09, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Jaq and Gus.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:Jaq and Gus.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 14:29, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

The Care Bears Movie
Hi Slgrandson! It's a pity that I cannot contribute to the visual design of the page, although I've created the images single-handedly. Dou you personally think that Nicholas deserves an own page on wikipedia (and the Spirit as well)? However, it would put me in the position to use several interesting images..... Wikifan87 22:08, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Wayne Gilbert
An editor has nominated Wayne Gilbert, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 17:15, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Charles Bonifacio
An editor has nominated Charles Bonifacio, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 17:29, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of John van Bruggen
An editor has nominated John van Bruggen, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 17:29, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Peter Hudecki
An editor has nominated Peter Hudecki, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 17:29, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

Deniel Causo
Hi. Thanks for your tag. I can't find the relevant AfD - where is it? --Dweller (talk) 14:53, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
 * It wasn't nominated at all. Actually, I marked it as a G4 repost. --Slgrandson (How's my egg-throwing coleslaw?) 14:59, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Hi. The policy's badly worded, but speedied (or prodded) material's not eligible for G4 (hence the wording that comes up with the speedy tag). I deleted it anyway, for being a breach of copyright. Cheers --Dweller (talk) 15:07, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

Airman's Cave
As an FYI, you put a WP:CSD tag on this page, but that only applies to pages that have been deleted through an WP:AFD discussion, which this had not been. I tagged it and deleted it as a WP:CSD instead. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 15:47, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

Ok, so I've re-written the article, removed anything that I can see as copyrited and would love any help on what else I need to do to keep this article from being deleted. I have articles that I can link to that are very credible that back up the information I'm trying to present in this article but since I've been deleted twice, I'd like to be sure before I include links or anything. Lacitpo (talk) 00:38, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

Informing past contributors of new TFD for Template:Maintained
As you were a contributor in the last TFD, I am letting you know that Maintained is again up for deletion. Please review the current version of the template and discuss it at the TFD. Thanks! &mdash; BRIAN 0918 • 2008-01-30 17:48Z

Fair use rationale for Image:Oopsy teaser title card.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Oopsy teaser title card.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. SchuminWeb (Talk) 01:27, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Wish Bear on the lookout.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:Wish Bear on the lookout.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 03:25, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Cozy Heart saves Bedtime.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:Cozy Heart saves Bedtime.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:58, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Dvdv6 094.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Dvdv6 094.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 20:25, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Dvdv6 094.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Dvdv6 094.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 04:51, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
 * I've already replaced this one with Image:Cheer Bear.jpg on the grounds that it is a better name. --Slgrandson (How's my egg-throwing coleslaw?) 04:53, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

Violets Are Blue
Well, what is the validity of disambiguation page like this. Only one link in this page, and one red link.  Otolemur crassicaudatus  (talk) 07:20, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

New mailing list
There has been a mailing list created for Wikipedians in the New York metropolitan area (list: Wikimedia NYC). Please consider joining it!  Cbrown1023   talk   21:39, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

Timmy's World at Night
Thank you for the successful RfD on this rather irritating mass of vandalism. I hadn't had a chance to finish it off -- blame College Bowl. :) Cheers! -- Miwa * talk * contribs ^_^ 16:38, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

You are invited!
In the afternoon, we will hold a session dedicated to meta:Wikimedia New York City activities, and have salon-style group discussions on Wikipedia and the other Wikimedia projects (see the last meeting's minutes).

Well also make preparations for our exciting Wikipedia Takes Manhattan event, a free content photography contest for Columbia University students planned for Friday March 28 (about 2 weeks after our meeting).

In the evening, we'll share dinner and chat at a local restaurant, and (weather permitting) hold a late-night astronomy event at Columbia's telescopes.

You can add or remove your name from the New York City Meetups invite list at Meetup/NYC/Invite list.

You're also invited to subscribe to the public Wikimedia New York City mailing list, which is a great way to receive timely updates. This has been an automated delivery because you were on the invite list. BrownBot (talk) 03:33, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Films coordinator elections
The WikiProject Films coordinator selection process is starting. We are aiming to elect five coordinators to serve for the next six months; if you are interested in running, please sign up here by March 28! Girolamo Savonarola (talk) 10:32, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Bellflower Bunnies title card.JPG
Thank you for uploading Image:Bellflower Bunnies title card.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 23:37, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Sorry, I got so carried away by all of this hard work. All of that, and a few things at my home, made me forget to add Non-free TV screenshot when I had to. I hope that doesn't happen to me again. --Slgrandson (How's my egg-throwing coleslaw?) 00:07, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

Luck, North Carolina
Luck, North Carolina is a real place. I was able to verify this at http://geonames.usgs.gov/pls/gnispublic/ and http://geonames.usgs.gov/pls/gnispublic/f?p=gnispq:3:::NO::P3_FID:1021305 --Eastmain (talk) 01:13, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

PR request
I will read it and comment in more detail in a few days - sorry, but I am busy until April 1. I did look it over and have a few ideas - since you refer to episodes by their title in at least three languages (English, French, and German), I would also always give the Episode number when referring to them in DVDs, etc. Again I just skimmed it, but it was not clear to me what the basis of the official episode number is (vs. aired sequence). Ruhrfisch &gt;&lt;&gt; &deg; &deg; 01:29, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

Peer Review Etiquitte
Slgrandson, I mentioned before in my comments that you should not edit other people's comments in the peer review to mark things as done. This includes striking out those comments and adding your own in the middle of other people's comments. I have undid your last edit to the PR page. Please leave a reply comment to each section noting what was and was not done and asking any questions rather than striking out or otherwise modifying other people's comments. Collectonian (talk) 21:16, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

RfA Thanks
 A message from Warthog  Demon.

Ok!
I'll check them over :) Judgesurreal777 (talk) 02:20, 5 April 2008 (UTC)