User talk:Slightlyslack

Image Tagging Image:Lapd pacific division.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Lapd pacific division.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, consider reading fair use, and then use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Shyam ( T / C ) 12:50, 21 March 2006 (UTC)

Thanks
Hi Slightlyslack,

I just wanted to say thanks for Heavy-Chemical Industry Drive, which I just noticed. Definitely helps to fill some gaps in our coverage of South Korean economic history!

Cheers, -- Visviva 06:48, 4 April 2006 (UTC)

Mid-City Los Angeles
Well, just to warn you, the terminology mid-city los angeles doesn't exist. I tried to make a page on the region by making a Central Los Angeles region entry, (that term doesn't exist either), and a wikipedia member with editing rights deleted my page because the terminology didn't exist. So she may delete yours too, so I don't think it's worth it to make an articles that aren't strictly backed by the LA almanac or popular opinion in Los Angeles, because otherwise, you're bound to have someone like her go ahead and delete, redirect or otherwise disfigure your contributions.

Copyright problems with Pueblo del Sol, Los Angeles, California
Hello. Concerning your contribution, Pueblo del Sol, Los Angeles, California, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). As a copyright violation, Pueblo del Sol, Los Angeles, California appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Pueblo del Sol, Los Angeles, California has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) and CC-BY-SA, under CC-BY-SA, or released into the public domain leave a note at with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Abductive (talk) 22:05, 23 July 2009 (UTC)

Nomination of Milorganite for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Milorganite is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Milorganite until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  Velella  Velella Talk 13:58, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Milorganite has been substantially reworked since you created it, and as Velella was kind enough to inform you, it is being considered for deletion. 7&amp;6=thirteen (☎) 17:41, 29 March 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:51, 23 November 2015 (UTC)