User talk:Slimdoofy/Cigold

Suggested move duplicate

 * The following discussion is closed. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
 * duplicated nomination

User:Slimdoofy → Cigold – The major reason for this move is to help researchers and general online users who are trying to get information on the artist,"Cigold" for whom the page was created(rather than the user,"Slimdoofy")speedily and accurately recover information needed which is the sole purpose of an encyclopedia. This will enhance web searches in spooling required information faster on the subject,"Cigold" in search engines as their is no much information on the artist apart from that obtainable in his social media sites. Slimdoofy (talk) 01:00, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

Survey

 * Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with  or  , then sign your comment with  . Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.



Discussion

 * Any additional comments:


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

Suggested move

 * The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the proposal was procedural close. Per Requested moves, RM isn't the right process for this. I would personally echo Zzyzx11's warnings if you wish to "publish" this draft in its current state. --BDD (talk) 00:57, 5 January 2013 (UTC)

User:Slimdoofy/Cigold → Cigold – The major reason for this move is to help researchers and general online users who are trying to get information on the artist,"Cigold" for whom the page was created(rather than the user,"Slimdoofy")speedily and accurately recover information needed which is the sole purpose of an encyclopedia. This will enhance web searches in spooling required information faster on the subject,"Cigold" in search engines as their is no much information on the artist apart from that obtainable in his social media sites. Slimdoofy (talk) 01:00, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment - requested moves is the wrong process for this. You should follow the articles for creation process. That said, as stated below, this would not survive long in mainspace.--ukexpat (talk) 18:00, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

Survey

 * Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with  or  , then sign your comment with  . Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.



Discussion

 * Any additional comments:


 * Warning: As it is currently written, if this page is moved from this user page to an article, it will most definitely be nominated for deletion. The subject current fails Wikipedia's notability guidelines on musicians. In any encyclopedia, including Wikipedia, information cannot be included solely for being true or useful. A person must be notable, important or significant FIRST before he is eligible to have a Wikipedia article on him. He has to have been the subject of multiple, non-trivial, published works appearing in sources that are reliable, not self-published, and are independent from the musician or ensemble itself. Wikipedia is not a means of promotion, for the purposes of search engine optimization, to improve search engine results. All content on Wikipedia must be verifiable and be supported by reliable sources, not a blog or social media. Regards. Zzyzx11 (talk) 05:05, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Userpages and sandboxes
It'd be better if you used a subpage instead of your userpage for your draft articles, per WP:UP and WP:USD. This way you can't be mistaken for your draft article, and comments about your draft article and to you personally are not mixed together, or lost when your draft article is moved to articlespace. -- 76.65.128.43 (talk) 03:40, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Moved to subpage. Apteva (talk) 07:31, 4 January 2013 (UTC)