User talk:Slime Soccer

Please do not remove db-tags from articles you created yourself Travelbird 11:34, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

Please do not delete content from articles on Wikipedia. It may be considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Travelbird 11:48, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

Please do not delete slime articles, there is already one on wikipedia - slime volleyball. That is not a candidate for deletion, therefore neither should Slime Soccer.

Image tagging for Image:Slimesoccer.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Slimesoccer.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 12:10, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

Slime soccer
Please do not repost articles deleted in accordance with Wikipedia deletion policies. Travelbird 12:24, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

== Please Answer ==

Why was this article deleted, when anothere slime article - slime volleyball - is not deleted? This article is not yet completed, although will be shortly.

Please stop. If you continue to vandalise Wikipedia, you will be blocked. Travelbird 12:42, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

Reposting deleted content, final warning
This is your last warning. The next time you create an inappropriate page, such as Slime soccer, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Seraphimblade Talk to me Please review me! 12:43, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

Why is this article up for deletion? Please answer, as slime volleyball is not. If you delete one, you must delete the other surely.


 * Just because one article exists, that shouldn't, doesn't mean another such is allowed. However, Slime Volleyball is not speedyable because it cites at least one secondary source, giving it some assertion of notability. The Slime Soccer article had no such assertion, and so was speedily deleted. If you think Slime Volleyball should be deleted, feel free to nominate it, though I suggest you choose a better reason than "Mine got deleted so this one has to go too!" Seraphimblade Talk to me Please review me! 13:46, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

Slime Volleyball
If you feel that this page should be deleted as well, feel free to nominate it at WP:AfD Travelbird 12:46, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Hurleyvan.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:Hurleyvan.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Abu badali (talk) 21:46, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Hurleyvan.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Hurleyvan.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:51, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Hurleyvan.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Hurleyvan.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Josh Milburn (talk) 15:08, 24 July 2015 (UTC)