User talk:Slime of Truth

Welcome!
Hello, Slime of Truth, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Roswell UFO incident has not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and has been or will be removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or in other media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. Additionally, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or. Again, welcome. Amortias (T)(C) 20:18, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

September 2015
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Roswell UFO incident, you may be blocked from editing. Moriori (talk) 23:11, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Roswell UFO incident shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. —C.Fred (talk) 23:15, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

You have been blocked for 24 hours from editing for continued abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Moriori (talk) 23:26, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Roswell UFO incident. ''Using Wikipedia articles for the promotion of fringe theories is not permitted. Further disruptive editing on your part is likely to result in the loss of editing privileges. This should be regarded as a DEFINITIVE AND FINAL WARNING. '' Ad Orientem (talk) 23:31, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
 * I note that you have already been blocked while I was preparing the above warning. Please take this onboard and reflect on what you want to do here. Constructive editng is welcome. Disruptive behavior is not. If you have an WP:AGENDA that you are unable to check, then your time here is likely to be brief. If you have questions about how to improve articles that deal with controversial subjects please ask an experienced editor or post a note on the article talk page. Thank you... -Ad Orientem (talk) 23:35, 27 September 2015 (UTC)