User talk:Slimgeeismee

June 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Gabriel Rojas Hruska has been reverted. Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): \bmyspace\.com (links: http://www.myspace.com/philipandgabriel, http://www.myspace.com/gabrielrojashruska). If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 21:46, 16 June 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Philip Michael Jonathan Guiver
A tag has been placed on Philip Michael Jonathan Guiver requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Beeblebrox (talk) 04:36, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
 * MySpace pages and other self published sources do not meet Wikipedia standards for reliability, because anyone can make one up and say anything they like on it. What is needed are references from third party sources that are independent from the subject. My own search of Google news turned up nothing of the sort on this individual. If you are aware of any such sources, please add them to the article. Beeblebrox (talk) 04:44, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
 * I wasn't suggesting he didn't exist, but rather that you have not established his notability through verifiable sources. Also, all you have to do with is add it to the page under the deletion notice, I'm not sure what you were trying to do with the coding, but I fixed it for you again. Beeblebrox (talk) 05:04, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Gabriel Rojas Hruska
A tag has been placed on Gabriel Rojas Hruska requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Rnb (talk) 04:53, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
 * 1) editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
 * 2) participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
 * 3) linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. For more details about what, exactly, constitutes a conflict of interest, please see our conflict of interest guidelines. Beeblebrox (talk) 05:06, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

how to userfy articles that are not ready
If an article is not up to Wikipedia standards for inclusion, it is a good idea to work on it in userspace as a subpage until it is ready. For example, User:Slimgeeismee/Philip Michael Jonathan Guiver. This will greatly reduce the chances that it will be speedy deleted, and give you a place to work on it relatively privately. Beeblebrox (talk) 06:45, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

Word to the wise...
Don't write articles about yourself. It smacks of vanity and poor taste. C1k3 (talk) 06:55, 17 June 2009 (UTC)