User talk:Slipknot7792

Speedy deletion of Ethan Thomas
Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. J.d ela noy gabs adds 20:24, 13 May 2008 (UTC)


 * [[Image:Information.svg|25px]] Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from a page you have created yourself.  If you do not believe the page should be deleted, you can place a  tag on the page, under the existing speedy deletion tag. (please do not remove the speedy deletion tag) and make your case on the page's . Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page.  Ros0709 (talk) 20:28, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

Please leave the page as a redirect. It's a waste of space to keep a single line of text on a page. -- Cheeseman Muncher (talk) 20:38, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

May 2008
The recent edit you made to Ethan Thomas constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. TheDJAtClubRock :-) (T/C) 20:45, 13 May 2008 (UTC))

Speedy deletion of Ethan Thomas
A tag has been placed on Ethan Thomas requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Cheeseman Muncher (talk) 20:46, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Padunk
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Padunk, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Zero ghits for this term (unlike paddidle). Fails WP:VER, WP:MADEUP

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. andy (talk) 09:33, 30 May 2009 (UTC)

Jeff Dunham
Please do not add content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to Jeff Dunham. Doing so violates Wikipedia's policy of verifiability. If you are familiar with Citing sources, please make sure you include reliable, verifiable sources when adding material to articles. Thank you. Nightscream (talk) 22:38, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

Stop adding unsourced material to the article, as you did with this edit. Adding material without specifying a reliable, verifiable source is a violation of WP:Verifiability and WP:No original research. Please see those policies. Thank you. Nightscream (talk) 23:51, 1 December 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Springfield Fire Company


A tag has been placed on Springfield Fire Company requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Zackmann08 (talk) 21:49, 1 April 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:52, 24 November 2015 (UTC)