User talk:Slipknotfan389

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~&#126;); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Chooserr
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Thank you for experimenting with the page George W. Bush on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you feel that the edit I reverted should not have been reverted, please contact me. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 21:25, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Republican Party (United States). It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. If you feel that the edit I reverted should not have been reverted, please contact me. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 21:32, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

November 2007
I see you're back with this one edit, in which you vandalize somebody's user page. As I look at your short edit history, I don't see anything constructive. Can you give me a reason not to think that this is a vandalism-only account? -- Hoary 23:01, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

Blocked
As you don't yet seem to have read what's written above, I thought you'd benefit from a cooling-down period in which you will be able to read it. -- Hoary 23:09, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
 * On returning from your block, your first edit was, again, not constructive. Please refrain from joke edits or you will be blocked for an indefinite period. Rockpock  e  t  19:18, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of ED (Encyclopædia)
A tag has been placed on ED (Encyclopædia), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. faithless  (speak)  01:31, 1 December 2007 (UTC)