User talk:Sliszcl01

November 2019
Your addition to Irish War of Independence has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Copying text from other sources for more information. DuncanHill (talk) 17:32, 15 November 2019 (UTC)

When adding links to material on external sites, as you did to Government of Ireland Act 1914, please ensure that the external site is not violating the creator's copyright. Linking to websites that display copyrighted works is acceptable as long as the website's operator has created or licensed the work. Knowingly directing others to a site that violates copyright may be considered contributory infringement. This is particularly relevant when linking to sites such as YouTube or Sci-Hub, where due care should be taken to avoid linking to material that violates its creator's copyright. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. If you believe the linked site is not violating copyright with respect to the material, then you should do one of the following:
 * If the linked site is the copyright holder, leave a message explaining the details on the article Talk page;
 * If a note on the linked site credibly claims permission to host the material, or a note on the copyright holder's site grants such permission, leave a note on the article Talk page with a link to where we can find that note;
 * If you are the copyright holder or the external site administrator, adjust the linked site to indicate permission as above and leave a note on the article Talk page;

If the material is available on a different site that satisfies one of the above conditions, link to that site instead. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 14:44, 25 November 2019 (UTC)

Your addition to Irish War of Independence has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Copying text from other sources for more information. If you do this again I will have you blocked. 💵Money💵emoji💵Talk💸Help out at CCI! 20:28, 29 November 2019 (UTC)

December 2019
Hello. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Irish War of Independence have been undone because the proposed text was unsalvageably incoherent. (For example, the terms "re tionary", "sai", "Arguab" and "Cath" are not English words. If other editors, familiar with the topic, cannot determine the meaning that was perhaps intended (and salvage that meaning through correction), then the reader is very unlikely to be able to make any sense of this.) If this was "copy and pasted" from some kind of book-scanning OCR technology, then please consider using more reliable sources and technologies. Or, per the multiple other suggestions above, please stop copying and pasting content from other sources into articles. With no consideration to their meaning, validity, relevance or copyright status. Copy/pasting random, malformed and copyrighted content into the project is not helpful to the project. Thanks. Guliolopez (talk) 19:18, 1 December 2019 (UTC)


 * Hi. Me again. In relation to this edit. It is undisputed that the Soloheadbeg ambush is considered the start of armed hostilities in the Irish War of Independence. However, it is entirely redundant to state as much twice. In two sentences. One after the other. That fact was/is already covered within the article. In the paragraphs which immediately preceded your addition. Adding the same content (with slightly different wording, in immediately successive sentences) is not an improvement to the article. Please consider engaging with one of the four separate editors who have offered suggestions or advice on your talk page. Or on the relevant article talk page about what it is that you are trying to do/add. Or the multiple other channels available to new editors for help. But please stop ignoring these messages on your talk page. And carrying on regardless. As it is not helpful. Not in keeping with the mores of this project. And not a good use of anyone's time. Your's included. Cheers. Guliolopez (talk) 23:50, 1 December 2019 (UTC)