User talk:Sloosher

You know full well two different people can be socks at the same time.

Look at the results of many of the previous cases of the same sockmaster and who filed them. I did. And all were blocked and confirmed to be Chinese-proti by the checkuser.

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Chinese-proti&action=history

ask if you can file the case again because Chinese-proti is definitely socking.

You were all involved in blocking or reverting Chinese-proti socks. Take a look at the page history and archived cases. See Sockpuppet investigations/Chinese-proti/Archive

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Chinese-proti&action=history

So who is going to file legitimate sockpuppet cases if the filer will get reverted every time? If he comes back can I ping you to file a case? Bbb23 isn't interested in pursuing socks he didn't block first. Sloosher (talk) 16:05, 26 May 2020 (UTC)

May 2020
 Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive. ([ block log] • [ active blocks] • [ global blocks] • [//tools.wmflabs.org/xtools/autoblock/?user=&project=en.wikipedia.org autoblocks] • contribs • deleted contribs • [ abuse filter log] • [ creation log] • change block settings • [ unblock] • [ checkuser] ([ log]) )

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee. Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  21:49, 26 May 2020 (UTC)