User talk:SlovonManob

Dloh cier ekim  (talk) 18:08, 20 December 2018 (UTC)

December 2018
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Trial of 6ix9ine have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Materialscientist (talk) 12:14, 5 December 2018 (UTC)

SlovonManob, you are invited to the Teahouse!
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to User:Alex Hurteau. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ― Abelmoschus Esculentus talk /  contribs 14:00, 11 December 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Ale Jithendra


The article Ale Jithendra has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp/dated tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. —teb728 t c 17:07, 11 December 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Ale Jithendra


A tag has been placed on Ale Jithendra requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Natureium (talk) 18:01, 11 December 2018 (UTC)

December 2018
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Kodak Black, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 20:48, 15 December 2018 (UTC)

Recent edits to 6ix9ine
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, 6ix9ine, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 23:48, 16 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Hello. Multiple editors have reverted your addition of the word "Notable" to the "Feuds" section header. A discussion has been opened on the article's talk page regarding this. As has been pointed out, the word "Notable" is subjective and prone to a given user's own conclusions. Please do not add the word "Notable" to this section heading again without a consensus for such being reached on the talk page. Thanks! Striker force Talk 15:21, 19 December 2018 (UTC)

December 2018
Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on David Barksdale. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Magnolia677 (talk) 18:14, 17 December 2018 (UTC)

Please, I’m sorry, it was in good faith. Please don’t block my verifiability. SlovonManob (talk) 01:40, 18 December 2018 (UTC)

The Blade of the Northern Lights ( 話して下さい ) 17:52, 20 December 2018 (UTC)


 * Well, as you are amenable to renaming, please choose a new name. Copy the following block of text and replace "new username" with the new username of your choice. . If you ping me, i can rename you if I'm online. Thanks -- Dloh cier ekim  (talk) 18:08, 20 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Hey @ Dlohcierekim can you officiate my name change please and thank you.

Dloh cier ekim  (talk)

Hey @ Dlohcierekim Could you rename me to my new username please and thank you.SlovonManob (talk) 01:07, 21 December 2018 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation
—  Newslinger  talk   23:52, 24 December 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Ale Jithendra for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ale Jithendra is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Ale Jithendra until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. signed,Rosguill talk 23:27, 6 February 2019 (UTC)