User talk:Slowe4333

Slowe4333 (talk) 11:54, 24 April 2024 (UTC)== August 2021 ==

Hello, I'm Oshwah. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Demian—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   17:57, 12 August 2021 (UTC)

Maybe you can't comprehend the thought of a female character possessing agency, so the existence of a female solely as a warm body upon which males paint their dreams really counts in your mind as "Women play a vital role". In fact, this is contradicted in the final sentence of this section, "Hesse uses them symbolically as facets of the depths of Sinclair's mind.". Women do not exist in this book - men exist and women are represented merely as the projected fantasies of the male protagonist. I HAVE READ AND STUDIED THE BOOK.

Welcome!
Hi Slowe4333! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Happy editing! ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 20:29, 22 April 2024 (UTC)

Introduction to contentious topics
ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 20:29, 22 April 2024 (UTC)


 * Commons-emblem-notice.svg You have recently made edits related to gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them. This is a standard message to inform you that gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing . For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Contentious topics. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 21:30, 22 April 2024 (UTC)

Your comment about activist editors
Hello, Slowe4333. Regarding your comment about unnamed "political activists on Wikipedia" at Talk:Shemale: for starters, you should always assume good faith on the part of other editors. They are here for the same reason you are, namely, to improve the encyclopedia. If, on the other hand, you have evidence that someone is writing articles in a non-neutral way based on an activist political agenda and not strictly based on Wikipedia policies and guidelines, then you may mention that at their user talk page, for starters; if that doesn't resolve the issue, stronger measures are available to you. But be forewarned: if you make baseless accusations against another editor, that would be in violation of our WP:CIVILITY policy, and if you show a pattern of such behavior you risk sanctions for violation of our policies, so please do not make such accusations against any editor unless you have evidence for it. If you have any questions, feel free to reply below, or you may ask at the Help desk about this or any other topic concerning Wikipedia. Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 21:29, 22 April 2024 (UTC)

April 2024
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 21:38, 22 April 2024 (UTC)

see unblock request below Slowe4333 (talk) 11:54, 24 April 2024 (UTC)

yes, 331dot - I am pinging you so you can read my response; I'm not afraid to have this debate with you. The facts are on my side. Slowe4333 (talk) 07:10, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
 * I apologize, I incorrectly used the word "exclusively"; I should have said "largely". I am not interested in a debate with you; if another admin wishes to unblock you, they will take action. 331dot (talk) 08:11, 26 April 2024 (UTC)

Slowe4333 (talk) 08:18, 26 April 2024 (UTC)  Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive. ([ block log] • [ active blocks] • [ global blocks] • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • [ abuse filter log] • [ creation log] • change block settings • [ unblock] • [ checkuser] ([ log]) )

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.