User talk:Slpage2

Hi, the reason your addition keeps being removed is that is appears to be original research which Wikipedia does not do. If you have reliable sources for the statemeents then it might be included. JoshuaZ 18:07, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

Its funny because I noticed that there are only 4 citations there now, yet lots of information/opinion that is not directly cited. Would phrasing my points in the form of legitimate scientific avenues of inquiry be acceptable?


 * As far as I am aware, the details in the article are in the cited sources(see WP:RS,WP:V and WP:OR. If they aren't, it might be good to remove them. JoshuaZ 03:57, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

p.s. On talk pages it is good to sign your name using four tildes- ~. This will be replaced by your username and time of edit. JoshuaZ 03:57, 26 January 2007 (UTC)